User talk:PookieYum

Welcome!

Hello, PookieYum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Xdenizen 11:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Article of Nonsense

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with Britneys Butt. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.121.7.56.203 12:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Elaich 15:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Mullet Crew

A tag has been placed on The Mullet Crew, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hawaiian717 00:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Britney Spears

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mieciu K 20:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Th_britneyspearshakebutt.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Th_britneyspearshakebutt.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 01:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 03:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 10:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conerns about List of characters in Camp Lazlo

There is a discussion about removing the clean-up tag on this article. I also point out some concerns I have with the article, which include daughter articles, etc. It would be great if someone would respond to that. Squirepants101 21:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Philip J. Fry

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Philip J. Fry. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Will Mak 050389 01:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisms

Why these vandalisms are amusing to you is beyond me. Have you tried watching TV instead? Re: Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions, on a sesame seed bun.

Having just had to fix that, have this -

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.-- Alf ^melmac 01:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Muller

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Alex Muller, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ... discospinster _talk 19:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of James Dockter

A tag has been placed on James Dockter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 17:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove the db tag from articles you have written. Follow the instructions in the pink box. Corvus cornix 17:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to If I Never Get Back. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. C. Foultz 17:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to If I Never Get Back, you will be blocked from editing. Corvus cornix 17:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Image:Girlbutt3.jpg

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Image:Girlbutt3.jpg. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Corvus cornix 17:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St. James Elementary School

Fully replacing an article about one school with content about a school in another state is not the usual Wikipedia manner. Normally, if there are two or more entities with the same name, we find a way to disambiguate. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 17:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Thedjatclubrock :) (talk) 12:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have looked through your edits and based on them I have blocked you for a month. You may think it's funny to move pages around and add nonsense to articles but you are just making work for others to clean up. You may appeal this by using the {{unblock}} template and another admin will review the block. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]