User talk:Ponyhorse

Notability of Native american artist

A tag has been placed on Native american artist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. LukeTheSpook (talk) 05:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Native american artist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -WarthogDemon 05:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tammie Allen Swirl Bowl.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Tammie Allen Swirl Bowl.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 17:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Polly, I have deleted this picture because I had a studio take this picture for use and paid for negatives, etc., but have to look for the person who took the pictures. I am still unsure of how to add photograph and copyright since this is the first time i have done this. Thanks, Tammie

Image source problem with Image:05 Santa Fe IMarket 1st Place.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:05 Santa Fe IMarket 1st Place.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 17:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Polly, This picture was taken by general photographer for the Jicarilla Apache Chieftain, newspaper. It was used in the under caption under the photograph. I guess i am unaware of how to add the credit so I just added the Jicarilla Apache Chieftain. I have deleted because I was unsure of how to add it with a correct copyright source.

Tammie Allen‎

You recently added a hangon template to this article; however, I cannot see that anyone has proposed it for speedy deletion. Perhaps you intended to add a "in use" template to indicate a large edit in progress or meant to add the template to the page for one of the article's images? Rmhermen (talk) 18:13, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Firing Micaceous.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Firing Micaceous.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 19:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Polly, I am the owner of the firing of Micaceous.jpg. I took the picture.

Jicarilla Apache Page

Wikipedia's Jicarilla Apache page is extremely short and not very informative. You might consider expanding it, since you have written about the tribe on your Tammie Allen page and are obviously highly knowledgeable about the subject. Cheers, Uyvsdi (talk) 03:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]