User talk:Polygamist times 4

Welcome!

Hello, Polygamist times 4! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KGV (Talk) 09:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

You are still doing it

Sorry to be on your back but you are still not using our talk pages properly. Article talk pages are for discussion of the article. In this edit you answered a query with your opinion about a canned hunt, not about the quality of our article on a canned hunt. Please do not do this. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 16:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply to "Why cant I ask whats FFP policy on hunting is, someone said they wher epro hunting before, I was asking for clarification"

Hi again Polyx4, thank you for your post on my talk page, but as you can see above it is visually better to ask your query as text rather than as a heading... anyway, I've had a browse through your edits to see what your particular issues are. Firstly, noone is going to go through your edits and delete sections that which breach policy and the parts that don't (although I don't see much that doesn't breach talk page guidelines), your edits regarding the Liberal Party and Family First Party were clearly general discussions about the Parties and expressing your views about them. Trying to engage in a discussion about if they are pro or anti hunting is not legitimate discussion page talk. I'm not saying that noone else on the talk pages hasn't also breached this same policy by discussing the same issues, if they did they were wrong and could have legitimately been warned as you have been. Examples of discussion which are inappropriate:

By their Abortion statement, they define "from conception" as their point of life begining and therefore are against abortion.

Im sure all the intelligent people who live on this blog, know that both types of The Birth Control Pill and the IUD do not guarentee conception (Sperm fertilising the Egg) does not happen. These forms of birth control do odviously stop the embryo making it to full term, by stopping the fertilised egg from continuing.

So by their statement they are also opposed to both types of the Birth Control Pill and the IUD. Im sure alot of the ignorant Family Family First candidates, party members do not even realise this. Im sure alot have nothing against the pill, so these are hypocrites aswell as ignorant.

PS. it is also inappropriate for you to have multiple accounts.

It is appropriate however to discuss the legitimacy or accuracy or notability of a reference which refers to the Party's policy on birth control. I hope this makes it clearer, if it doesn't I suggest you read the guidelines thoroughly to avoid further reverts. Cheers, Alec ✉_{﹌ }^۞ 10:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]