User talk:Polyduo

Welcome!

Hello, Polyduo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 09:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi and thanks for your message on my talk page. However, I have to admit I'm not sure why you bothered asking when within 30 minutes you just went and removed the tags again. The issues have not been resolved, there are still plenty of unsourced claims in the article. According to WP:BLP either these should be removed from the article or the maintenance templates should be left in place until they are sourced. Melcous (talk) 08:56, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have done as you asked already. When you leave messages on a talk page, please leave them at the bottom of the page rather than randomly in the middle. Melcous (talk) 09:03, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Polyduo. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 09:47, 6 June 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Conflict of interest question

Can you please answer the question I asked you on my talk page - how can it be if you have no connection at all to Dominic Lam that you have uploaded photos of him and claimed them to be your own work? Until this is clarified, I will restore the conflict of interest template on the article. Melcous (talk) 04:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I got the picture from this article http://magazine.lakeheadu.ca/2015/spring/dominic-man-kit-lam/, done updating the image source.Polyduo (talk) 09:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case, then this image and any other that you got from the internet is not your "own work" and to claim it is violates wikipedia's terms and conditions. The copyright belongs to the person who took the photo, not to you, and the images will need to be removed. Melcous (talk) 11:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The discussion is about the topic Dominic Lam (physician). Thank you. Melcous (talk) 12:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Alex Shih (talk) 16:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please appeal your block from your original account, and disclose your conflict of interest on whether or not you have been paid to contribute. Alex Shih (talk) 16:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]