User talk:Politics of Maharashtra

Shivsena Office Dadar Sock puppet

Vandalism by Shivprasadwiki

Vandalism Politics of Maharashtra (talk) 09:39, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Shadow4dark (talk) 09:59, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Politics of Maharashtra (talk) 10:02, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Balasahebanchi Shiv Sena vandal Chennai Super Kings Lover has correctly added that BSS lost to Uddhav Sena Politics of Maharashtra (talk) 10:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Has incorrectly I mean Politics of Maharashtra (talk) 10:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No party lost to other Politics of Maharashtra (talk) 10:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Crompton editz per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shivsena Office Dadar. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 11:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]