User talk:Polish29

Welcome!

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Thanks!

Thanks for helping with the problem I had at Talk:Spieprzaj dziadu!. Dzieki wielkie! Malick78 (talk) 19:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poles in Belarus

You reverted my edit for the second time so you don't agree with it. I was waiting for your arguments in the article Poles talk page and as you didn't oppose I was sure you are understandiing these reasons. That is why I've edited Poles in Belarus values erasing yoursef calculated figures with the wrong link to the CIA Factbook as CIA never published these calculations. Pozdrawiam, Bogomolov.PL (talk) 16:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing reliable sources from the Polish people. Keep in mind that I did NOT delete your 2009 Census data when you removed what was there before including WP:RS reference point for this year. I offered a range based on both estimates. You didn't. I would appreciate if you read what constitutes WP:NPOV editing, away from the notion of WP: I just don't like it. Look for the middle ground. Pozdrawiam, Polish29 (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You claimes (in fact) the 1999 Census data are still relevant even after 2009 Census? Why new census data can not replace outdated 1999 Census? WP: I just don't like it? YOU offered the RANGE - 2009 Census data comes from recent official source, but based on the YOUR PRIVATE HYPOTHESIS of the constant 1999 Poles share value CALCULATIONS ARE YOUR ORIGINAL RESEARCH. So (see WP:OR) is not any relevant contribution to the Wikipedia, isn't it? I've erased your original research - I have do that. Pozdrawiam, Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Church of the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Kraków

Hello! Your submission of Church of the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Kraków at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pgallert (talk) 20:30, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Church of the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Kraków

On 4 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Church of the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Kraków, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 06:03, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Polish29! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 03:07, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]