User talk:Pokie007

Pre svega, dobrodošli na Vikipediju! Drago mi je što imam prilike da se obratim svom prezimenjaku. Pogledao sam Vaš članak. Moram napomenuti da politika Vikipedije kaže da korisnik ne može napisati sam o sebi članak, ali to sad nije toliko bitno. Ja sam korisnik Vikipedije već više od godinu dana. Aktivan sam na Vikipedijama srpskog i engleskog jezika. U planu mi je da postavim članak o prezimenu Pokrajac, pa sam tako krenuo sa pravljenjem članka. Radnu verziju možete pogledati ovde. Potreban je ceo i dobar prevod na engleski, pa bi Vaša pomoć bila od izuzetnog značaja s obzirom da moj engleski nije na visokom nivou. Pozdrav, --Pockey 22:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Pokie007! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 105 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Dragoljub Pokrajac - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dragoljub Pokrajac

The article Dragoljub Pokrajac has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable scientist. There is no claim of meeting the criteria in Wikipedia:Notability (academics)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rockpocket 10:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aleksandar Lazarevic

The article Aleksandar Lazarevic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable scientist. There is no claim of meeting the criteria in Wikipedia:Notability (academics)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rockpocket 10:23, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aleksandar Lazarevic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aleksandar Lazarevic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandar Lazarevic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cool guy (talk • contribs) • he/they 23:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]