User talk:Pokemega32

Welcome!

Hello, Pokemega32, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! BD2412 T 22:55, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True - how odd! I left a message because I saw that you were editing and apparently no one had stopped by to say hello before. BD2412 T 23:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

evolution lines

Please stop inserting non-canon evolution lines (and I am not talking about the Stingmon one here, but stuff like the Armadillomon line mega, or full Gazimon or Gotsumon lines). It is considered original research and repeatedly adding it may be considered vandalism. You may wish to join the WikiProject digimon system updates to discuss guidelines related to digimon articles. Circeus 21:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vikemon is Armadillomon's Mega form, it says so right in his profile! The Digimon pages relate to all Digimon! Not just the ones who appear in the show! Alternate lines included! -- Pokemega32 22:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which profile? please see Wikipedia;Cite your source and Wikipedia:Verifiability. If you want to add such information that cannot be veriieddirectly in the anime series, do provide sources. Circeus 01:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing tags

Please do not remove tags such as the fair-use disputed tag on Image:Fenway12.jpg, unless you have resolved the underlying problem. Thanks. --Yamla 17:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

You don't have to make an AFD subpage for articles that can be speedy deleted. -- Ned Scott 19:27, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the speedy deletion thing was put on one page after I made the AfD page and I guess I put the other one there bu accident.

testing

Thank you for experimenting with the page Pomeranian (dog) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Trysha ^(talk) 17:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your change breaks the template. You could see the picture before - You don't need Image: in front of the picture - putting it there puts extra random text into the infobox template. - Trysha ^(talk) 18:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

note: if you couldn't see the image before, you are having some sort of browser issue. - Trysha ^(talk) 18:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agumon

The reason that I am replacing the image is because of notability, that's all. Most people here recognize the current image better than the savers one. Having an image depicting a character known in the U.S. is more notable than having an image known more in JAP. After all this is the English wikipeida and I see no source in the article from bandai that states the savers Agumon design has replaced the old one. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Hope you understand. -- bulletproof ^3:16 22:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking my page

You're right there isn't anything in the story about that. On the same note there's no dinobeemon on tv either. He's strictly in the cards. its common sense genius. Wk21030 00:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Digimon Story is a VIDEO GAME, don't post stuff from the cards or show there!!! Pokemega32 00:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Really? well there's no link explaining that so why don't you suggest or do that.

There doesn't need to be a link to Digimon Story on every Digimon page, you could've searched for it.... Pokemega32 00:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have to if it isn't known there should beWk21030 00:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you to put ANYTHING on my personal page?Wk21030 03:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC) this is a direct violation of policy.[reply]

Fair use rationales

The images you have uploaded have no explanation of why they are allowable on Wikipedia under the fair use guidelines. They will be deleted in one week unless you can provide a fair use rationale. Please see Wikipedia's copyright policy for an explanation of what content is acceptable. Thanks. --Slowking Man 08:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your message at my Talk page. --Slowking Man 05:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ShineGrey,monBM.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ShineGrey,monBM.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Platinumnumemon.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Platinumnumemon.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KingChessmon.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:KingChessmon.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations

I would like to know why my account is being accused of being a sockpuppet of this rhodeislandhero! I assure you, I am in no way connected with this account and would not like to be banned from editing for two years! Would something please contact me about this? Pokemega32 (talk) 01:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Pokemega32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

70.181.24.188 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusing multiple accounts: See the editing pattern described at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Greg Jungwirth

Blocking administrator: EdJohnston (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Although the checkuser case is still pending, the evidence suggests that you are the same person. Saying 'I am in no way connected with this account' is incorrect, as you have said elsewhere that that user is a friend and neighbor. I am content to wait for consensus that you are a different user before any unblock is considered. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, what? I've never said that anyone was a friend and neighbor! Where did you get that from? Pokemega32 (talk) 19:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked back at the discussion page for the sockpuppet thing. Greg Jungwirth posted that Rhode Island hero was his friend, not me! Pokemega32 (talk) 19:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake; your editing styles are so very similar that it is difficult to tell you apart. Don't worry; the checkusers are very good at separating the socks in any drawer. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In what ways are our styles similar? Pokemega32 (talk) 19:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Pokemega32 sent me some email asking about his block. I noticed that his registered account was not blocked directly. So I asked him to follow the {{Autoblock}} procedure, which I think is why he posted this unblock-ip request. I notice that Pokemega32 and his IP are not named explicitly in the newly-filed Jungwirth RFCU nor in WP:Suspected sock puppets/Greg Jungwirth (3rd), though checkuser may yet discover that his IP is involved. So his IP is one of those that was blocked in the Jungwirth sock cases. Note that:

70.181.24.188 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)),

is one that was clearly used by Jungwirth in the past, based on behavior (see all that 'Colective' stuff in the contributions). Since this IP must be static, I guess we need to have Pokemega32 tell us more about how he happens to be using that IP. If we are sure he is not connected to Jungwirth, we might conceivably reduce the block to anon-only. (The IP is currently hardblocked). EdJohnston (talk) 04:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although I don't know how it's the same IP as the other account, I'm pretty sure this is the same IP address I've always had. Is it possible for more than one computer to sue the same IP?

Also, my account definitely is banned from editing, not just my IP when not logged in. I'm listed under the page on Rhode Island Hero, not the one on Greg Jungworth.

And what about my behavior is similar to him? Pokemega32 (talk) 05:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no direct block on Pokemega32. Are you using more than one account? And how are you getting your internet service? EdJohnston (talk) 14:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I only have one account here. That doesn't count stuff on Wikia sites and other wikis does it? My ISP is Cox.... Is there anything else I need to answer? Pokemega32 (talk) 19:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sharing an internet connection provided by an institution? Since the IP is static, and more people than you are using it, it's a bit mysterious. The paradox is how you could not know Greg Jungwirth if you and he are on the same IP. EdJohnston (talk) 23:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is just a normal home connection. We have a wireless router though, but I doubt it would spread far enough that someone living nearby would be able to use it. And I definitely don't know any Greg Jungwirth. Pokemega32 (talk) 02:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know we seem to be giving you a hard time. But take a look at Special:Contributions/70.181.24.188 and see the February and March 2008 entries. If you had the same IP address back then, how do you explain those vandalistic edits? Surely that wasn't you? You were editing as Pokemega32 on 22 April 2008 while the 70.181.24.188 IP was blocked. How were you getting your internet connection then? EdJohnston (talk) 03:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That one's actually an easy explanation. I was in Philadelphia with my latop at the end of February. It was the wireless connection from the hotel. Pokemega32 (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that bit of info helps. But the February and March vandal edits? Those were made from your home IP during the time that you had it? EdJohnston (talk) 13:21, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I still have absolutely no idea how that happened... I'm gonna have to call Cox about this... Pokemega32 (talk) 14:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the security level on your home wireless could be cranked up a notch? EdJohnston (talk) 15:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it could. I'll look into it...Pokemega32 (talk) 15:07, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ebi

Ebi is anything in Decapoda. Lobster just looks better than Shrimp.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChaosPegasusmon 2

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 22:39, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pokemega32. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pokemega32. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pokemega32. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]