User talk:Poiuytre

Welcome!

Hello, Poiuytre, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Andeh 13:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Running Man Barnstar
		Looking through you have done some great work with the Scotland national rugby league team article. Real good quality of writing and dissemination of information, made it look a real professional piece of work. CorleoneSerpicoMontana 10:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Important vote at wiki-project rugby league

Many people have been working hard on getting a new infobox up and running and we would like to have your thoughts on the subject here. CorleoneSerpicoMontana 07:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Brisbane Easts

A tag has been placed on Brisbane Easts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 08:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crusaders RL-Stadia

Hello, great to see a genuine Welsh person and Crusaders fan editing, especially with such detail and vigour. Just a quick word on the note under the Others section that states "The club have also played one match each at Murrayfield in Edinburgh and the Millenium Stadium in Cardiff during the 2009 and 2010 seasons respectively as part of the Magic Weekend event." Firstly, only from 2011 does the Magic Weekend return to the Millennium Stadium, the event hasn't been held there since 2008. Secondly, I just wonder about the notability of mentioning this at all, as all the Super League teams, not just Crusaders, play at the stadium during the weekend, so I can't see how mentioning this under "Other Stadia" is necessary. When you think about it, if you were to do this, you would possibly have to mention every other stadium that crusaders have played at. The Magic Weekend fixtures are neutral venues, so cannot be classed as another venue that Crusaders have called their own, if you get my meaning.

Thanks,

Ymron (talk) 11:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pension scandal and potential winding up order.

Have you read this? Is there any truth in it? Any serious repercussions for Crusaders?

Ymron (talk) 13:54, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:The Clash (9 November 2010)

Hi Poiuytre! As a member of The Clash WikiProject I thought I would let you know that The Clash portal went live today 9 November 2010. At the moment, the portal has 7 selected articles (Joe Strummer, Mick Jones, London Calling, Paul Simonon, Topper Headon, Rock the Casbah, and Should I Stay or Should I Go), some other articles are still in development and more will come in the future, 7 albums (London Calling, Combat Rock, Sandinista!, The Clash, Give 'Em Enough Rope, Super Black Market Clash, and Cut the Crap), 14 pictures (all covered by a free license; for the full list please check out this page), and 50 hooks for the DYK section (full list here). There are also sections on categories, topics, wikiproject, related portals, associated wikimedia, and more. Take a look when you have a second. Cheers. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 23:10, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rebrand

News speculation in the Guardian says Crusaders will be out of administration early next week, and will be rebranded again as the Welsh Crusaders. I was wondering 1) if you have heard this 2) if you know of any truth in this and 3) whether moving the Crusaders Rugby League article is a viable option any time soon.

Thanks a lot,

Ymron (talk) 07:25, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CambridgeWards.png

Thanks for uploading File:CambridgeWards.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other Nationalities rugby league team

Hi Poiuytre, I believe you orginated the Other Nationalities rugby league team article, would it be possible for you to point me in the direction of the reference you used, as I've been trying to find details of the Other Nationalities team. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 14:01, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 16:05, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2008RLWC map

Template:2008RLWC map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 04:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Rock Sound, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jane Doe, Converge and Young Guns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2008 England national rugby league team season

The article 2008 England national rugby league team season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Out of date, Not part of a series

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 05:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gramophone record (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Tempest, Babel, El Camino, Bloom, Boys & Girls, Sigh No More, Jack White and Coexist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vinyl revival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital downloads (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Franconian Pigs

The article Franconian Pigs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 00:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Flag of Pembrokeshire.png

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Pembrokeshire.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:22, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images of logos, flags, etc. gets a little tricky because there are two issues at play with these. There is copyright of the image and copyright or permission to use the design. Even if the design is free of copyright, as appears to be the case here, there is still the issue of copyright of the image (i.e. the PNG file). Here you indicated the author (i.e. creator of the image) was Peter Stock (who in fact was the designer of the flag), but gave no indication of permission by him to use his image. If YOU created the PNG file based on his design, I would suggest changing author to own work and clarifying that the flag was designed by Peter Stock. If you downloaded the PNG file from the Flag Institute and uploaded it, then the Flag Institute owns the copyright to the PNG file and permission will need to be obtained, or a new image created and uploaded under a new license. It might also be a good idea to include the tag Template:Insignia under permissions when uploading a government flag, seal or coat of arms. Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 17:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional counties

Hi, I notice that you have created a number of pages concerning "traditional" counties. I have raised a thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Traditional counties. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heidelberg Sharks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heidelberg Sharks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidelberg Sharks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 22:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Traditional counties of the United Kingdom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Welsh, Cornish, River Avon, Norton and County Derry

List of county days in the United Kingdom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Saint Magnus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rohrbach Hornets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rohrbach Hornets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohrbach Hornets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ben Ben (talk) 13:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ScotlandRLlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ScotlandRLlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Bloonstdfan360 / talk / contribs 22:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Conservatism

added links pointing to Conservative Party, Interventionist, Front National and Welfare system

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Poiuytre. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Poiuytre. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2008 RLWC map

Template:2008 RLWC map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Poiuytre. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Old England RL Logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Old England RL Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of highest-grossing films in Hong Kong

added links pointing to Mr. Nice Guy, Jimmy Wang, Benny Chan and Alan Mak

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rugby League Varsity Match

The article Rugby League Varsity Match has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this meets any wp notability standards

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --2603:7000:2143:8500:39D6:DE69:AE5D:177E (talk) 05:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Pembrokeshire.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of Pembrokeshire.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 00:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just making sure my data agrees with yours

Hello, according to my data for the first four Jackie Chan Police Story films, the highest to least grossing in Hong Kong when adjusted for inflation, are in order:

1. Police Story 2

2. Police Story 3: Supercop

3. Police Story

4. Police Story 4: First Strike

Just confirming that your data is the same when it comes to the correct order from highest to least grossing in Hong Kong of the first four Jackie Chan Police Story films when adjusted for inflation. Yellow Sunstreaker (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rugby league teams in Germany

A tag has been placed on Category:Rugby league teams in Germany indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Veneto 9s

The article Veneto 9s has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable RL tournament. Article is completely unreferenced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rugby League Varsity Match for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rugby League Varsity Match is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby League Varsity Match until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 08:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nootdorp Panthers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nootdorp Panthers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nootdorp Panthers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 16:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Obj191geo81pg2p9.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Obj191geo81pg2p9.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]