User talk:Poi dog pondering
|
Your reverts to Falkland Islands
[edit]Please remember to mark your edits as minor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thanks! (Oh and please remember to sign your comments on talk pages with ~~~~ - thanks) DrFrench 22:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Falkland Islands. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. DrFrench 22:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes WP:NPOV is policy, but you have to provide evidence in the form of references and citations that Malvinas is in common usgae as an English word. Otherwise I really cannot see what aspect of [{WP:NPOV]] is being broken. Please do not desctibe people as vandals when they are only implementing WP:MOS, take the discussion to the talk page if you want to change the consensus, otherwise the consensus version should remain. DrFrench 21:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- You have now been reported for violating WP:3RR on Falkland Islands. DrFrench 22:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)