User talk:Poettruth

Unspecified source for Image:HS2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HS2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Lawrence Mays.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:HS2.jpg. The copy called Image:HS2.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 11:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Mays

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Lawrence Mays, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. --Brian Olsen 16:16, July 30, 2007

In response

Hi - I appreciate the comments you left on my talk page. Please understand that it was nothing personal, and the decision to remove your page was not made by me. I flagged it for deletion, and what that does is draw the the attentions of an administrator. If that person doesn't agree with me that the page is worthy of deletion, it won't be deleted. I posted a notice on your talk page when I added the tag - it described the steps you could have taken to defend the page, and have it sent to Articles for Deletion instead, where a consensus of Wikipedia editors would have been required in order to delete the article.

Nevertheless, I believed the article was worthy of speedy deletion. I looked up all the sources you added, and they seemed to be either from your own company, or simply your entry on the Dramatists Guild page, and yes, being a member of the Dramatists Guild page in and of itself doesn't make you notable, any more than being a member of Actors' Equity makes me notable. I couldn't rewrite your page in order to save it, because I couldn't find any reputable sources that established notability.

Another big problem is that Wikipedia has a guideline against conflict of interest, and in creating a page about yourself, you are violating that guideline. The general assumption is that if you are notable enough to have a page in an encyclopedia, someone else will create it. If you create a page on yourself, it comes across as self-promotion (perhaps a term I should have used instead of advertising). Still, conflict of interest isn't the main reason your page was deleted; violating the guidelines on biographies was.

You ask if it is up to me to decide who is notable; no, it's not. But here on Wikipedia, it is up to the consensus of editors. And consensus defines who and what is notable enough for inclusion. I didn't decide that policy, but I did bring a page that violated it to the attention of an administrator.

You said, "The world is full of new emerging playwrights and although they may not be in any book you have read, they exist. Shouldn't they be remembered? Shouldn't their story be told?" Absolutely they should be - I'm a director, and I work primarily with new emerging playwrights to help them tell their stories. But Wikipedia isn't the place for that.

You're right that a lot of pages have a lot of problems, but all that does is encourage me to fix what I can, not throw up my hands and ignore the problems I see. I hope you stick around and contribute; read some of the main guidelines:

and dive in; we can always use more editors. --Brian Olsen 00:16, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Prince Midas.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Prince Midas.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Lawrence Mays.jpg

The file File:Lawrence Mays.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]