User talk:Poetfellow

Hey there, Poetfellow and welcome to our great encyclopedia which currently has more than 6,915,795 articles! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some pages to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mystytopia (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Speedy deletion of Brain Patten

A tag has been placed on Brain Patten requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. shirulashem (talk) 01:55, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems I spelt the name wrong.Poetfellow (talk) 09:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Poetfellow, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, one of the pages you created, Roger Stevens (poet), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kudpung (talk) 10:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I have left a reply for you on my talk page, but I'll just add here, that among the best sources that would assert notability would be reviews in the press of the poet's own books of his poems that he has published, along with the year of publication, the ISBN number, and the name of the publisher.--Kudpung (talk) 11:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Orme for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Orme is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Orme until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —John Cline (talk) 10:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC) —John Cline (talk) 10:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roger Stevens (poet)

The article Roger Stevens (poet) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Current sources are dead links. No new reliable sources found when performing a WP:BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Isabelle ^🔔 12:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]