User talk:Pmoseneca

Welcome!

Hello, Pmoseneca, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vejvančický (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC) --Vejvančický (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Mehdi Mollahasani

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Mehdi Mollahasani, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mehdimollahasani.ca/. As a copyright violation, Mehdi Mollahasani appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mehdi Mollahasani has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mehdi Mollahasani and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Mehdi Mollahasani with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mehdi Mollahasani.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Vejvančický (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Mehdi Mollahasani. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

a request

You removed material from the article on Linda Frum, asserting the nearby references didn't substantiate it.

One example - you removed the assertion that she was a campaign chair for the United Jewish Appeal.

Okay, so how hard was it to do a web search to refute or confirm whether she held that position? It took me about 20 seconds to confirm that. [1]

I suggest to you the best way to improve a wikipedia article is to confine yourself to only editing in a cooperative way, and to forgo adversarial editing.

Once you remove material like that, and some other good faith contributor comes across a reference that substantiates her chairmanship, they have to duplicate the work of the person who first added the assertion. By removing that material you are making extra work for everybody.

When should we remove what we think are undocumented assertions from articles? I dunno. Obvious instances of libel/slander -- which this wasn't. Obvious instances of assertions that seem incredible -- like an assertion she was campaign chair for the Canadian Nazi party, or buddhists for nudism, or the flat Earth society? I'd remove those too, as likely drive-by vandalism. But Frum agreeing to raise fund like this? Highly credible, even if it isn't explicitly referenced.

We don't footnote everything. We don't footnote "The sky is blue".

Please remember, every one of us is subject to moments of normal human fallibility. Did it occur to you that one or more of the references did support that assertion, and you had a moment of normal human fallibility, and didn't recognize it said so?

If you want to improve the Linda Frum article, and you come across an assertion you really think needs a citation, why not spend enough time to do your own web search, and, if it is easy to provide the reference, provide the reference yourself. If you think you are too important to do that kind of work, we have tags contributors can place after assertions they think need a citation.

But simply removing non-controversial assertions, because they don't seem to be referenced? Please, in the interests of actually improving the article, don't do that.

Could you go back to the Linda Frum article, and revert all the excisions you made because you didn't recognize a supporting reference, and either find a reference, or use a tag requesting other contributors look for a supporting reference?

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 20:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]