User talk:Pmatlock
Copyright problems with Wesley charitable foundation
[edit]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Wesley charitable foundation, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://wesleycharitablefoundation.org/about.htm. As a copyright violation, Wesley charitable foundation appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Wesley charitable foundation has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Wesley charitable foundation and send an email with the message to permissions-en
wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. - If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Wesley charitable foundation with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Wesley charitable foundation.
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Wesley charitable foundation and send an email with the message to permissions-en
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 19:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wesley Charitable Foundation, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://wesleycharitablefoundation.org/about.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Wesley Charitable Foundation
[edit]I have nominated Wesley Charitable Foundation, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wesley Charitable Foundation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Theleftorium 16:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, you've posted on the discussions talk page, please repost your reasons for keeping the article on the project page.--TParis00ap (talk) 17:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
May 2010
[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Gypsies. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
June 2010
[edit] Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Gypsy. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2010 (UTC)