User talk:Pluto2027

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mike Bradley (politician) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mike Bradley (politician) was changed by Pluto2027 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903855 on 2017-10-30T03:22:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Mike Bradley (politician). Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As further information, please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Wikipedia is not a forum, blog, soapbox, fan site or advice site. It is an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not publish rumors, personal opinions, commentary, advocacy, original research or unsourced information likely to be changed, challenged or disputed. See also Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Five Pillars, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Wikipedia:Citing sources, Help:Footnotes, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Words to watch and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners; Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Wikipedia:Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Bradley (politician), you may be blocked from editing. Home Lander (talk) 03:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bad robot editing

I am just collecting quotes from the Sarnia Observer and The Sarnia Journal Pluto2027 (talk) 03:39, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mike Bradley (politician). Donner60 (talk) 03:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand, do u not believe the truth?

I understand you may not like smaller towns or Canadians, but why would you lie to the public Pluto2027 (talk) 04:08, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. m.o.p 05:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Pluto2027 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19631 was submitted on Oct 30, 2017 05:23:19. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 05:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lisa Aubin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Lisa Aubin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. EricEnfermero (Talk) 05:37, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]