User talk:Plumcherry

Sword World RPG

Welcome to Wikipedia - and thanks for expanding Sword World RPG! Percy Snoodle 17:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, and thanks for your helping. I am not a native English speaker. Please correct Englsh of my contributions. Plumcherry 00:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi! Thanks for your contributions regarding Japanese RPGs. It's too bad most of them will never be available in English, since many of them seem very interesting. Anyway, I've gone and corrected your English in most of your articles to the best of my ability, as you requested above. :)--Filby 13:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for helping me. I am going to write new articles about Japanese RPG. Please assist me more.Plumcherry 17:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'll do my best.--Filby 00:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ino01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ino01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ikki

It's a minor detail, but I am curious as to the reasoning behind your change from "peasants" to "farmers" on the disambig page Ikki. Since this is taking place in the Edo period, in a feudal society with a strict class system, and particularly in light of the grand social changes brought by the Meiji Ishin and the accompanying attitudes towards society, I think it would be good if we paid attention to the language of such things. Hyakushō (百姓), translated most often as "peasants", is likely among the most respectful terms used to refer to the common people, the uneducated masses, in the Edo period and earlier; by contrast, Nōmin (農民), a term that likely did not appear at all until the Meiji period, is often translated to "farmer" and gives much more the connotation of an empowered and educated citizen, one of the People that make up the Nation. I imagine you were probably simply making a minor edit, of something you thought was simply a matter of being more PC or something like that, but for my part, I personally think that distinctions between (feudal) peasants and (free) farmers are important. Thank you. LordAmeth 18:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Japanese Wikipedia article "一揆(Ikki)"。--近世の百姓一揆も peasant uprising と英訳されて紹介されているが、現実には peasant の意味する零細な小作人だけによるものではなく、むしろ村落の指導的な立場に立つ裕福な本百姓らによって指導されており、彼らはむしろ英語で農場経営者を指す語である farmer と訳すのがふさわしい事を考慮すると、これも歴史的事実に即した英訳とは言えない。(Hyakusou Ikki(百姓一揆) at the early modern age is translated into English "peasant uprisng", But this is not an English translation that suits historical facts. Ikki is actually being guided by not only petty tenant peasants but also by affluent farmers who stand in a leading standpoint of the village, and it is suitable for Hyakusou Ikki(百姓一揆) at the early modern age that they translate into "farmer" that is the word to which the farm manager is indicated in English.)

Actually, the most famous Ikki leader "Sakura Sougorou"(佐倉惣五郎) is a affluent farmer, not a peasant. Thank you.--Plumcherry 04:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Thank you for taking the time to consider my question. LordAmeth 10:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon

Hi! Thanks for adding the paragraph to Dragon. I could not quite figure out what you were trying to say, otherwise I'd simply fix up the grammar. Could you perhaps rephrase it with a link to a reference or a source? Thanks! Here is the text: "Japanese culture is also often expressed by Western people that it relates to dragons like as Chinese culture. It is uncomfortable for Japanese people because Japanese consider that dragon isn't Japanese mythical creature but Chinese one.". Kuru ^talk 18:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice and helping. I'm sorry for my poor English. I wanted to say....

Western people think that dragon is a symbol of Chinese culture.
And they often confuse Japanese culture with Chinese culture. They tend to wrongly use dragon as a symbol of Japan, too.
Most Japanese think that dragon is not Japanese monster but Chinese monster. Of course, Japanese don't think dragon is own ethnic symbol like as Chinese people.
Japanese cannot understand the reason why Western people tend to use dragons to describe Japan. --Plumcherry 13:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of GURPS Runal

I saw that you are the main contributor to the GURPS Runal article, so I'd like to let you know that it has been proposed for deletion. The editor nominating it finds that there not sources confirming its notability. Could you supply them? The article says that 20 novels are based on this setting. Could you give a source for this information? Happy editing, Goochelaar 12:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me again. Is this page about the novels? Their actual existence is disputed. Independent sources would be even better. (I can't read Japanese, I am afraid...) Bye, Goochelaar 13:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see. I try to provide you independent sources, but English sources is probably difficult. - Plumcherry

Thanks for the addition to the article! You might also want to follow the debate about this article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GURPS Runal (2nd nomination), if you are interested. Happy editing, Goochelaar 13:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of GURPS RebornRebirth

An article that you have been involved in editing, GURPS RebornRebirth, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GURPS RebornRebirth. Thank you.--Gavin Collins 14:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GurpsRebornRebirth.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GurpsRebornRebirth.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ChaosFlare.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ChaosFlare.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ChaosFlare.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:ChaosFlare.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --βandβ ^{(talk•contribs)} 10:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Blade of Arcana 3e.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blade of Arcana 3e.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:D&D replay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:D&D replay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gurps Runar.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Gurps Runar.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stigma rpg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stigma rpg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SATASUPE.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SATASUPE.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ara01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ara01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nw siro.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Nw siro.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Alsff01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alsff01.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Culture of Japan

Hi! I reverted your recent edit. Please see this. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 19:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Meikyū Kingdom

The article Meikyū Kingdom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantima (talk) 02:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kaze no Stigma RPG for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaze no Stigma RPG is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaze no Stigma RPG until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Standard RPG System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kadokawa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Plumcherry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Plumcherry. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Inou Tsukai

The article Inou Tsukai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources of any kind. Unresolved maintenance tags for last four years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chetsford (talk) 10:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Double Cross (role-playing game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Double Cross (role-playing game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Cross (role-playing game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 10:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chaos Flare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaos Flare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos Flare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 10:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gear Antique for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gear Antique is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gear Antique until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 10:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dcs01.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dcs01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GearAntique.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GearAntique.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChaosFlare.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChaosFlare.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FarEast Amusement Research for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FarEast Amusement Research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FarEast Amusement Research until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 05:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inou Tsukai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inou Tsukai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inou Tsukai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 23:11, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chaos Flare

Hello, Plumcherry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chaos Flare".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 10:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ino01.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ino01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Terra the Gunslinger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terra the Gunslinger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terra the Gunslinger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tra01.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tra01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Star Legend for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star Legend is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Legend until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:36, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Satasupe

The article Satasupe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidcence GNG is met. BEFORE only found one passing academic mention here, WP:SIGCOV is not met.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SATASUPE.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SATASUPE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Struggling to find sources for Alshard

Came to the article to try to help it by adding citations, but I can't find anything talking about it outside of random forums, so I was wondering how you came across the information for the article? FLIPPINGOUT (talk) 22:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alshard

The article Alshard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Could not find any reliable sources after a Google search, with all sources being user generated websites or shop listings. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MimirIsSmart (talk) 13:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]