User talk:Pllrosewoodliar

Welcome!

Hello, Pllrosewoodliar! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Chander For You 14:32, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

November 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Lizzie McGuire Movie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Diffs: [1][2][3][4][5] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bye Bye (Ariane Andrew song)

The article Bye Bye (Ariane Andrew song) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 05:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Nikthestunned. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Karlie Redd, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Nik thestunned 10:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Rachel Roy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm NitinMlk. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sunny Leone have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 14:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox film instructions and Starring parameter

Re: these edits at Spy (2015 film), and specifically your seemingly exasperated edit summary, "The correct cast. Stop changing this. Nargis had a huge role in movie!!, if you plan to edit any film articles you need to be familiar with Template:Infobox film and MOS:FILM. "Starring" is not interchangeable with "appearing in". "Starring" roles are special credits given to actors who have negotiated for such billing. They're not made up by random editors who happen to like actor X and thinks that actor X played a big part in the film. Per Template:Infobox film instructions:

Insert the names of the actors as they are listed in the billing block of the poster for the film's original theatrical release. If unavailable, use the top-billed actors from the screen credits. Other additions by consensus.

The film's poster credits McCarthy, Statham, Byrne, Hart, Cannavale, Janney and Law in that order. Nargis's name does not appear in the billing block. Thus, Nargis's name does not belong in the Starring parameter or the lead, and both instances have been reverted. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kapoor & Sons. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diffs: [6] It's not our job to gush over a film's perceived critical response. Even if you could directly support the statement that the film received generally positive response (which you did not do), the description of the response as "huge" would be an insult to neutrality. Summaries of critical response must be attributed to specific voices. See MOS:FILM instructions. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh...

Re: this, not a strong contribution. It's not our place to decide what the overall critical response was to a film, or to drool over article subjects. Not good, this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pllrosewoodliar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pllrosewoodliar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]