User talk:Pliming

October 2012

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Rosemary Valaire. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:25, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rosemary Valaire

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rosemary Valaire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 03:33, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Rosemary Valaire

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 03:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Rosemary Valaire. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:27, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rosemary Valaire shenanigans

I edited that article you created some. I added a little bit of info from the Times article and got all the internal links and references to actually work. I'll talk to the admins and work on getting it not deleted.SlimJimJones (talk) 06:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sing your posts

Type four tildes or click the signature button to sign your posts, otherwise everyone will know you're a noob. And thanks. SlimJimJones (talk) 06:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- signSlimJimJones (talk) 06:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Igor Schwezoff

Hello Pliming,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Igor Schwezoff for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Torreslfchero (talk) 11:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC (12922) 1998 WW19 was accepted

(12922) 1998 WW19, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TKK! bark with me! 00:40, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 10001 Palermo may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Planet
| mp_category = {{main belt]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:29, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 9999 Wiles may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/mpc.html Minor Planet Center

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 10001 Palermo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/mpc.html Minor Planet Center

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 22 Kalliope may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:51, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 34 Circe may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Please read WP:EL, and comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#External links. I don't think the links you've been adding to small positive integers are helpful, and I would like you to comment at the appropriate project page. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]