User talk:Playserious

This user may have left Wikipedia. Playserious has not edited Wikipedia since 9 July 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello Playserious! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting "adopted" by an experienced user How to: edit a page • upload and use images • start an article

Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention

Policies and guidelines

Neutral point of view • No original research
Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons

Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule
Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

User community

Build consensus • Resolve disputes
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • No legal threats

Community Portal • Village pump
Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists

Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review

Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Netsnipe ► 03:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2007

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags without properly following the protocols (as explained on the tag). To do otherwise is considered vandalism. Maustrauser 01:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit to A.P.E.:

Your recent edit to A.P.E. (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 01:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ape1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ape1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:APE

Template:APE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Mike Peel 21:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole "Coco" Austin

Hi, I noticed you reverted some of my changes here. You need to be mindful of the policy on biographies of living people, part of which states that

Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space.

Accordingly, I'm going to revert some of your changes until a source is provided. Cheers Kevin (talk) 07:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source and copyright for Image:Nicole "Coco" Austin .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole "Coco" Austin .jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

The file also doesn't have a copyright tag, so one must be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kevin (talk) 09:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole "Coco" Austin

Hi Playserious, Thanks for advising on how these pages should work. I'm not familiar with Coco, so I didn't know how she is most commonly refer to as. I have corrected the redirect. Next time you want to send someone a message, do it on their "Talk" page or "Discussion" page, not their "User" page. Clerks. (talk) 19:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please explain why you gutted Mallrats and replaced it with your own personal opinion. If you hadn't been an experience user, I would have issued you a uw-bi warning. AnyPerson (talk) 01:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting 20,000 bites of info to put in an unsourced rant verges on vandalism. If you can provide a reliable source, add a section on Criticism. AnyPerson (talk) 01:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually just add it to the Reception section, with reliable sources. AnyPerson (talk) 01:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mallrats, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AnyPerson (talk) 02:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your report of User:Tbrittreid to WP:AIV

Tbrittreid's edits DO NOT fall under definitions of vandalism as set out in Wikipedia:Vandalism. Therefore no action shall be taken against him. This is purely a content dispute, so please follow the steps as listed in Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. Thank you. -- Netsnipe ► 03:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BeatleForum.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BeatleForum.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 23:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Playserious. You have new messages at Guerillero's talk page.
Message added 23:43, 29 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Guerillero | My Talk 23:43, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]