User talk:Playerpage

Welcome!

Hello, Playerpage, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! 4twenty42o (talk) 10:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Philo Farnsworth

I think you found a very useful source with the Brigham Young High School Alumni association, and I hope Wikipedia editors will make use of it. I've had to revert your immediate edits, however, since they included statements that simply weren't supported by the source. The cited source doesn't name Glenns Ferry, for instance, nor does it give that convoluted reason about the professors' attitude making Philo choose the Navy. I would also note that anyone can claim to be a family member in order to try to make their edits seem more authoritative, and that even if one genuinely were a family member, personal knowledge is disallowed as original research.

I hope you'll look again at the source and only include what the source actually says. And I promise I, too, will try to make use of that source. In fact, I'll give it a go right now. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:39, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't use this page much, not sure if this is how I respond to you, or on your own talk page. Anyhoo, I appreciate you sending me the message, rather than just reverting without explanation. I got into quite a few flame wars on that wiki page in the early days of its inception, without really knowing what was going on! I am a family member of Philo's yes, my Grandmother was his sister. I know about that Brigham Young High School Alumni page because I have done a LOT of research on Uncle Philo, as we call him (at least in my line). I wrote my own biographical drama about him. That Brigham Young High School Alumni page is basically a distillation of most of the events in the biography of Aunt Pem (his wife), called "Distant Vision." I don't know that there is an online version or a Kindle of it or anything. She wrote it in First Person, so a lot more of the motivation comes through. The Brigham Young High School Alumni page DOES talk about his professors denying him entry into the advanced BYU classes, so if there are other things you didn't find "sourced," please be specific, so I can be. Thanks. Playerpage (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I would also point out that, even without references to "motivation," The original version of the page gets a great deal of the chronology just wrong. Playerpage (talk) 22:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for kind words on my page, and I'll go with the assumption you're indeed Philo's grand-nephew. I can't say much, in order to retain anonymity, but I once had the opportunity to speak by phone with Pem for an article. To this day, that and an interview with Buster Keaton's widow remain two of the most fondly remembered moments of my journalistic career.

I hope I've been able to correct some of the chronology based on the source you found. Philo Farnsworth for too long was in the shadow of RCA's propaganda machine, and while I equally admire Vladimir Zworykin — whom I actually met, when he was in his 90s — it has been such a pleasure over the last several years to see Farnsworth gain more and more due recognition. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your version (based on the page) has much better chronology. Thanks. I forget how easy it is to salt the scars when writing on Uncle Philo. I looked at my other entries just now and they weren't nearly as confrontational. I was drawn back to the Philo wiki page because I was on the BYU wiki page, updating some stats on my alma mater, when I noticed they were claiming he had received a B.S. from them when he first attended, which clearly wasn't true. I set about on their "Talk Page" to insist that they correct it, and got my hackles up about how he had been treated back then. This of course spilled onto the Philo page, even if it did remind me of a good source for his bio. One of the things I found amazing was that they were using as a source a 1950 essay from MIT that said nothing about Farnsworth's education, though it did give a brief overview of TV developments, heavy on the Sarnoff/Zworykin side. (http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1826025?uid=2134&uid=2493212183&uid=2493212173&uid=2&uid=70&uid=3&uid=60&sid=21106566226183) The purpose of the MIT article was to dwell on whether or not patent structure was good for invention--does it help the little guy or not? The author had been sold a bill of goods by RCA in his research that the only meaningful thing Farnsworth had was a patent, not useful technology mind you, just a good patent. The author even references the Zworykin/Farnsworth patent fight, without mentioning that Zworykin lost. It is pretty convoluted thinking, and it's amazing to see how quickly the RCA machine got to work. All of that is part of the subtext of why you were a better editor today than I. Playerpage (talk) 22:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Playerpage. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Playerpage. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Playerpage. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Animated Stories from the Book of Mormon (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Buidhe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to cite secondary sources (such as reviews of the series) to show that it is notable

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Animated Stories from the Book of Mormon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Animated Stories from the Book of Mormon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t · c) buidhe 04:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Playerpage! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t · c) buidhe 04:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Animated Stories from the Book of Mormon

Hello, Playerpage. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Animated Stories from the Book of Mormon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Animated Stories from the Book of Mormon

Hello, Playerpage. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Animated Stories from the Book of Mormon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:07, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your interest in Unsafe at Any Speed. After 60 years you keep the story alive and relevant. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bluerasberry Well, thanks! Playerpage (talk) 17:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hawn's Mill massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brigham. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]