User talk:Plastische erasmusmc

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Plastische erasmusmc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:X-ray delta shaped extra phalanx.tiff

Thanks for uploading File:X-ray delta shaped extra phalanx.tiff. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

Had a bit of an edit conflict there - all the polishing I did to your article on triphalangeal thumb overwrote the more recent modifications you made. Give me a few minutes and I'll incorporate your content (incl. images!) DS (talk) 14:07, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. I've added the images back in, and now I see that you haven't included any details about where the images came from or what licenses they're available under. We absolutely positively need those details, or else the images will get deleted. You do have a few days to get the information, but it's best to supply it when making the initial upload. (Good article, though.) DS (talk) 14:12, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, oh dear. Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction could be a problem - it looks like you copied it from (a whole bunch of) external sources. Now, you did cite those sources, which is good, but... you can't just copy/paste such huge quantities of content like that. You have to rewrite it. Use your own words. Understand? DS (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images needing sources and copyright status checking

File:X-ray TPT with polydactyly 2.tiff

Thanks for uploading File:X-ray TPT with polydactyly 2.tiff. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:X-ray TPT with polydactyly.tiff

Thanks for uploading File:X-ray TPT with polydactyly.tiff. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:07, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TPT five-fingered hand.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:TPT five-fingered hand.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:07, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Important note

(See below, rewritten with original writer's consent) FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 20:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Positioning of the flap.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Positioning of the flap.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The defect.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The defect.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image and copyright issues

Hi,

You've been writing some amazingly good medical articles - I'm not a doctor so I cannot tell fully their accuracy but they look very good indeed. By rights if they are as good as they look, some of them should end up at some point on the front page of Wikipedia eventually as featured articles, showcasing what editors can achieve.

I hope (and apologies for checking) they are not copies of other articles or books. I notice wording such as "which are discussed in this chapter" [1]. Are they all original works of your own, or is the text taken from elsewhere?

As for images, we have an automated system that's picking up a lot of issues on images you have uploaded. As an educational resource allowing reuse, we take great care to check that images are appropriately attributed and copyright status, copyright holder etc is known and useable. The software is noticing that the copyright status of many images is not clear, and the posts above are asking for this to be fixed on the images uploaded and any future ones.

The basics are that the images need to be "free" or public domain (ie can be used and modified by anyone), which usually means confirming who is the copyright holder and checking they are willing to (or have) released the rights to that extent, or if you are the copyright holder making clear you have done so, so we can host and use the images. Usually that';s done by a template on the image page which is easy to get used to after a few uploads. We're aiming to make it simpler but software rewriting to do this may take some time.

Meantime if you need help please let me know and I'll point you to someone able to do so. Let me know if you need help.

FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 20:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About this account

Thank you for the positive response. In fact, the content that we added over the last weeks has been added by medical students as part of a ten-week class on Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. All content created by the students has been checked by plastic surgeons or residents specialized in the topic of the page. As a supervisor for this project, we decided to use one account for all students. I am not sure if this was the right choice. Presently, the account is blocked and I am not sure how to correct this or what to do. In addition, we indeed has some problems with the images although we instructuted students very carefully on what to do. All material is in fact "free". I hope that this explains things a little and any help is appreciated.

I have not gone through all contributions, but the Peripheral nerve reconstruction article most definitely contains copyrighted material. Details are outlined on Talk:Peripheral nerve reconstruction.

Furthermore, sharing of accounts on Wikipedia is not within policy; see WP:ACCOUNT.

I would also say that Wikipedia is not a school project. We certainly welcome contributions from anyone who submits content that meets policies, but it is not for testing or learning, per se. (We have a WP:SANDBOX for learning how to edit from a technical perspective.)

Regarding unblocking, as the administrator who blocked your account, I will not be the one to review any request for unblock. That would be up to someone else. I suggest you read {{unblock}} as a start. You may also want to read WP:FIVE. Frank | talk 13:33, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. We understand that this is not a learning environment. However, I want to stress that this was small scale teaching. A total of 24 student choose this 10-week program on reconstructive surgery. In groups of two, they worked on this with each group having a separate supervisor, being either a plastic surgeon or an experienced plastic surgery resident. The supervisor was involved in designing the page, in editing and in approval before any content would be placed online. In fact, not everything that was written has been placed on Wikipedia. The topics were selected by the supervisor and is part of their medical specialty and in many cases were topics of their PhD studies. We feel that we can therefore really quantity the quality of the pages (although, in spirit of Wikipedia, of course they can always be improved).

We chosen one account so that I could monitor any changes after the project would be finished. However, I will change that and make sure that from now on everyone (including myself and the supervisor) will use a personal account.

As for the copy right issue on the topic of peripheral nerve reconstruction: there were a number of sentences that were similar from publications. It were single sentences from publications and the source was references but not quoted. We have tried to adjust this, but have not been able to publish the new version.

I appreciate your (plural?) efforts to rewrite Peripheral nerve reconstruction. Unfortunately, the content at Talk:Peripheral nerve reconstruction/Temp was not rewritten from scratch as the template advises. It remained unusable. For instance:

The source (at page 302) says:

This is not an acceptable method of handling previously published content on Wikipedia. You can only import previously published text if you can verify that it is public domain or compatibly licensed with our license. Even if it is, you must acknowledge that you are copying content to comply with our guidelines on plagiarism. If it is not public domain or compatibly licensed, you may use brief excerpts of text if these are clearly marked as quotations and used for good reasons such as those set out at non-free content policy and guideline. Otherwise, you may use the information, but not the creative structure of the original, which includes language but also may include selection and organization of material. (See Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing.)

I note that another new account came in and actually made the copyright problem worse. I've left a note about this at User talk:Wikiclass emc. If this is one of your students, please make sure that they understand that they must careful to comply with our copyright policies. As it says at the bottom of every edit screen, "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted." I'm sure this will be far more discouraging of their enthusiasm in the long run than having to take the time to properly paraphrase their sources.

I'm afraid that, given the continuing issues, both the article and its rewrite have had to be deleted. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:29, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Flowchart wiki.pdf

Thank you for uploading File:Flowchart wiki.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shadowed Soul 20:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Peripheral nerve reconstruction

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Peripheral nerve reconstruction, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from 3 offline sources; details on talk page of article, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Peripheral nerve reconstruction and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Peripheral nerve reconstruction, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Peripheral nerve reconstruction with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Peripheral nerve reconstruction. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Peripheral nerve reconstruction saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Frank | talk 21:58, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Smile surgery. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:02, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsed a series of CSD nom notices; articles have been deleted

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Speedy deletion nomination of Additional

A tag has been placed on Additional requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rahul^{Text me} 10:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Motor donors

A tag has been placed on Motor donors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rahul^{Text me} 10:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tension-free

A tag has been placed on Tension-free requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Top Jim (talk) 10:38, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neurorrhaphy

A tag has been placed on Neurorrhaphy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Top Jim (talk) 10:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CFNG procedure

A tag has been placed on CFNG procedure requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Top Jim (talk) 10:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Empty articles

Please STOP creating all these empty articles. If you want to create test articles, please use WP:User subpages. Top Jim (talk) 10:42, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Additional

A tag has been placed on Additional requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rahul^{Text me} 10:49, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Show an

A tag has been placed on Show an requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Top Jim (talk) 11:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Several complications

A tag has been placed on Several complications requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Top Jim (talk) 11:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Please stop creating empty articles. If you want to create test articles, please review WP:User subpages. Additionally, since this is the English Wikipedia, all articles must be written in English. Thank you. Cindamuse (talk) 11:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plastische erasmusmc,
there are problems with several of your image uploads. Please look at you commons:User talk:Plastische erasmusmc. --Túrelio (talk) 10:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Smile surgery worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 13:16, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a file deletion tag from the file description page of a Wikipedia file without resolving the problem that the tag refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Frank | talk 12:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. You have ignored all attempts to communicate with you regarding your file uploads, article creations, and template removals from articles. All editors on this project must follow policies. Several editors have made repeated efforts to contact you regarding your editing habits but you have not responded.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Frank | talk 13:04, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear

I was planning to leave you a warning today -- telling you that I did not want to block you, but if you didn't respond to messages we'd have no choice. It was going to be a short block, just to get your attention. But another administrator blocked you first.

The thing is, Plastische, you've submitted a lot of useful content... but you've also been making some serious procedural errors. Some very serious procedural errors. And we've been trying to tell you how to correct them, and you've been ignoring all the messages.

I'm really sorry about this, but you haven't shown any signs of even noticing that you were making mistakes. You can be unblocked if you post here, on your talk page -- although simply posting "I'm here, now unblock me" won't be enough, of course; you'll have to cooperate. Let us help you fix your mistakes, okay? DS (talk) 13:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Higher up on this talk page, I have responded to remarks on our contributions, explaining what happened and why some things have gone wrong. We are trying to correct the major procedural mistakes that we have made as much as we can. I want to stress again that the content has been carefully checked for accuracy and that the material that we placed is free of copyright, including the images. From now on, we will not share an account but use individual ones. Any help is appreciate and I will (now) monitor this page closely for comments and suggestions. I hope that we can be unblocked to correct our mistakes (there will not be much new material added in the coming period).

That certainly explains the situation. This is one reason that we do not permit shared accounts: although not all the students using this account were making procedural errors, they are all affected by the block! We do welcome the students' contributions (triphalangeal thumb is excellent, although we need more details for the images), but each student must keep their contributions distinct from those of their classmates. I suggest that they have userpages explaining "I am a student at the Erasmus Plastic Surgery Centre in Rotterdam, and this account is part of a class project" (or words to that effect). DS (talk) 12:46, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick response and understanding. I have communicated it to all students. In fact, going over the history of all 12 pages that were developed or modified, I noticed that some students already used an individual account and others started doing it last week. I know that the images on the triphalangeal thumb page are our own images and that we have written statements from the patients to use them. Hopefully, the student now know how to add them in the right way. We also still have one page blocked for possible copy right infringement: Peripheral_Nerve_Reconstruction. I will check with the students what is going on there. I am happy to hear that you welcome students' contributions. We have not often seen students so motivated for a writing assignment and there are many specialized topics within our field that have not be covered on Wikipedia so we are very interested in doing this again next year. My colleage and I will ensure then, of course, that we will not make the same mistakes!

You can see details of the copyrighted material on that page on Talk:Peripheral nerve reconstruction. That is not an exhaustive evaluation; those were three obvious sources that were directly copied rather than paraphrased. Also, please sign your entries on this talk page (not article pages, just talk pages) by adding ~~~~ after your entries. It helps easily identify who wrote what and when during a conversation. Frank | talk 15:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Full-thickness forehead flap, after stage 1.jpg

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:Full-thickness forehead flap, after stage 1.jpg, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:21, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Full-thickness forehead flap, after stage 1.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Full-thickness forehead flap, after stage 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 03:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]