User talk:Plantman77

Welcome!

Hello, Plantman77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Randall Fontes, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:12, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Randall Fontes

The article Randall Fontes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:12, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't worry too much about the deletion proposal. Your article clearly meets the Notability Guidelines and your sources are for the most part Reliable. Certainly enough to warrant keeping the article. Nefariousski (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for Fontes Article

Hi Plantman, nice work improving the Randall Fontes article so far. I've made a few changes, and if you don't mind, I have a couple of suggestions for further improvements. First (and most important), have a look at WP:LEAD; the opening paragraphs should provide an overview of the subject and article, as opposed to being the beginning of the topic's chronology.

I would also suggest broadening the section headings. Start with one on his background, education, early career, etc., then move on with 1 or 2 main sections (==Header==) on his work, with subsections (===Subheader===) for individual areas of research.

There are also a number of external links in the body of the article, this should be avoided. Use <ref> and </ref> to create inline citations, moving the links to the references section. See Wikipedia:External links for more on this. Happy editing! Wine Guy~Talk 23:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in Randall Fontes, remote viewing, and related articles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:39, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amatulic,

I removed the Puthoff external link from the remote viewing page as it is only indirectly relevant. As a student and as a psychology instructor I worked with Randall Fontes on primary perception of plants in the 70’s and was lucky to have had the opportunity to assist in the research at SRI. I got to know Dr. Puthoff and Russell Targ.

I had not seen Randall Fontes for 28 years and a mutual friend put us together last summer. He has continued his research but very few knew about it and the world should.

In particular the SRI report “Organic Biofield Sensor” by Puthoff and Fontes is a rare document held confidential for 35 years it is now available to scientist to study. It is the only report that I know of that was conducted at a major research facility that lends support to the research of Cleve Backster.

This document could be considered a Wikipedia scoop in this field of study. Paste “Organic Biofield Sensor” into Google and you will see this is a very rare document.

This was my rational. Thank You

Nomination of Randall Fontes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Randall Fontes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randall Fontes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 00:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]