User talk:Planier

Concern regarding Draft:Victor Myddelton Biddulph

Hello, Planier. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Victor Myddelton Biddulph, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is for YOU to decide on. It enhances an article YOU already have on wikipedia. If you do not want to use it to improve YOUR entry, fine. I have no idea what more to do with it. Thjis article is solely intended to expand material already available. If you do not think it is helpful to readres as a cross reference, dump it. 108.4.178.57 (talk) 04:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Victor Myddelton Biddulph

Hello, Planier. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Victor Myddelton Biddulph".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Victor Myddelton Biddulph

Hello, Planier. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Victor Myddelton Biddulph".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:06, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Marilou Awiakta, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may discuss this with other editors on the article's talk page. You reversed the meaning of sourced text, but did not add a new source. This misrepresents the sources and is considered disruptive. Please read the guidelines on citing sources. Thanks, - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 00:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source cited was absolutely correct. It was the way the statement to which it was attached that was inaccurate. It said Awiakta "claims" to be a Cherokee/ She is no Elizabeth Warren Pocahontas wannabe and she disliked the phrasing. The source to which it was attached clearly says she has Cherokee heritage; it is not merely a claim. The source cited is much better than the wikipe3dia entry. 108.4.179.191 (talk) 00:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Planier. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Marilou Awiakta, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising,[1] publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. I missed it at the time, but editing at the request of the article subject definitely falls under COI, and explains the commercial details, addresses and phone numbers, etc that were added to the article. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 01:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]