User talk:Plan8sucked then

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Plan8sucked then, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:00, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plan 8

A reference to Plan 9 from Outer Space, I take it? --Helenalex (talk) 06:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd assumed (wrongly) that it was a ref to Plan 9 from Bell Labs, but that's a name derived from the movie. It was a decent operating system in its time.-gadfium 06:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Botany

Good job! F (talk) 12:38, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of New World Order Party/meta/color

A tag has been placed on New World Order Party/meta/color, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of TemplateNew World Order Party/meta/color

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gary King (talk) 03:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Bill and Ben Party/meta/color

A tag has been placed on Template:Bill and Ben Party/meta/color requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NZ elections, electorates A-Z

Since we're working on the same pages should we collaborate? Fanx (talk) 04:32, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently ...

standardising wikilinks [electorate name (New Zealand electorate)] instead of (NZ electorate)
election dates with [comma year] and other nonsuch while I'm ...
reshuffling the party/candidate order from alphabetical to #votes gained (candidate, then party, then alphabetical - where two parties gain same #votes).
Also checking math on some pages - electionresults.govt.nz gives total votes cast, inc. informals - some pages didn't separate informals from total valid votes so to clarify matter ...
I've included extra line of Informal votes

I notice you've included a template 2008 result, as on Mt. Albert page. Was considering adding column of ±% swing & think we should discuss soon as it'll be hard yards once template starts filling up with results.

Abolished/renamed electorates need standardising, or perhaps some included into current electorate where broadly the same entity (Mt. Albert/Owairaka/Mt. Albert). Fanx (talk) 09:06, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since NZ does census every damn 5 years 60% of elections are with changed boundaries. I think swing should just be on seats that keep same name & disregard catchment changes. If swing varies from, or runs counter to national trend on account of changes it can be covered in history of seat (i.e in 2014 seat gained leftleaning suburb 'A' from neighbour electorate 'B' and lost part of conservative suburb 'C' to neighbour 'D' making seat more marginal according to 2011 results).

Regarding wikilinks vs. redirects ... yea, I'm a bit anal about that, so I'll just make changes when I come across them while doing other stuff. Damned if I know why they were changed (from NZ) anyways, in UK they are just that (see Vauxhall (UK Parliament constituency)).

edit: I do know why they were changed - it was an American edit-hog that did it to suit his own/his nation's inability to comprehend the meaning of 'NZ'. ... and here was me thinking it must have been some consensus. On that count, I'll stop 'fixing' these links.

Electorate names that are not suburb, town, region or city names don't have (New Zealand electorate) in their title.

Take your point on renamed electorates - leave as is then. ... and with you on the mācron thing.

Fanx (talk) 13:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would appreciate your comments on version of electoral results template in my Sandbox. It's based on UK Parliament constituency templates and has scripts to include Y & N winners & Losers, Elected member & List Member background colours, etc. Fanx (talk) 14:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the feedback. I felt changes were needed as some party colours (ACT, Green, National et al) had changed and that made the modified text labels difficult to read - separating the colour from the label seemed like a good fix. Since I'd noticed some party colours had changed I checked them all against any media I could find, mostly party logos or their current website colours. Some colours have been tweaked and I'm sure some more (as you suggest) could also be tweaked although I'm currently up to 43 different colours (some older ones not yet on meta/color page) and it's getting harder to put much variance between close colours without obscuring the party identity.[reply]

Since I was re-ordering tables by #votes, I was doing substantial editing anyway & was up to New Plymouth. I don't propose to rush though those I've already done, but those that still need doing can use the new template. As you've seen I also changed the colour of the winning MP to a pale green/blue (#CCFFFF) as I found the beige (#FFEECC) and pink (#FFE8E8) too difficult to differentiate.

Regarding NZ place names .... d'ya mean towns & suburbs? .... with random styles & such? A bit of a nightmare, maybe need to decide on one standard and .... leave until after election. Fanx (talk) 02:03, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Zealand Barnstar of National Merit
		Thanks for all your hard work on NZ Election related articlesTshiels1 (talk) 06:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
		_{this WikiAward was given to Plan8sucked then by Tshiels1 (talk) on 06:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

I knew you'd come crawling back...

You should probably visit Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/Election 2008 taskforce. There's work to be done. --Helenalex (talk) 09:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Albert by-election peer review

I notice you have contributed significantly to Mount Albert by-election, 2009. A peer review of the article has taken place, and your help on fixing the listed criticism would be appreciated. Thanks, Adabow (talk) 09:34, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]