User talk:Plamkii

Linking to Blogs

Please see Wikipedia:External Links. In particular, under "Links to be avoided", #12, "Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority.". That blogspot page is just one person's unpublished personal opinion, with no assertion of notability or authority of the author. --Mmx1 (talk) 05:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Mmx1 (talk) 23:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks on me

I answered you here. I was defending Sunni Islam from other Shi'a editors in this conversation, and it's very disturbing that right here you decide to insult me. The other Shi'a editor was claiming that some Sunni Muslims are anthropomorphic and hate Ali, and I said that there is not a single Sunni Muslim that fits that definition. I was trying my best on the Umar article so that we could have valid sources, and not aimlessly delete every source, and I removed myself from the development of that article because I was not being listened to. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 21:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way, I am a girl, not a man. Stop calling me "him", please. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 21:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

J-10 article

A reply to the following message posted on my talk page (talk) on May 01 2009:

"Hi,

Thanks for the work you're doing on the J-10B article. Please understand that deleting informative links can lead to edit warring. Please discuss any issues on the page talk page before taking action. Thanks & Best. --plamkii (talk) May 01 2009"

Hello. Please understand that GrandeStrategy may be an informative link, but it is still a blog. The GrandeStrategy article on J-10B is composed of information from other sources (which are already added to the external links section of the J-10 article) and speculation by the author. If you add the link again, I will not remove it because I do not want an edit war. But I will bring the issue up on the talk page and get more experienced editors involved. Blogs by enthusiasts are not authoritative sources. You told me to discuss this matter on the article talk page before editing, but you did not do so yourself. Please do not add warnings on my talk page when you are not willing to follow their advice yourself. Hj108 (talk) 15:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]