User talk:Pkbwcgs/Archive/January 2018
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Pkbwcgs. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Disambiguation link notification for January 2
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Laricoideae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Washington State
- Straightaway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Robert Strauss
- Venezuela national basketball team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Jose Rodriguez
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
ISBN fix may need improvement
This ISBN fix appears to work, but the syntax is wrong and will probably cause problems in the future. The square bracket that is at the end of the previously linked URL needs to be moved to the left of the ISBN template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Done See [1]. If you have further questions, feel free to ask. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
new Mexico
Please do not blindly change "new Mexico" to "New Mexico" without understanding the context. There is no "New Mexico border wall". ―Mandruss ☎ 19:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Mandruss: My intention was general cleanup for in Wikipedia entries for spelling and formatting, not to make controversial edits. However, I understand this and I won't make this mistake again. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- I've pulled your AWB access. There are just too many complaints about your editing with it. Yes, they're relatively minor, but it shows that you're not paying enough attention to what you're doing. You are welcome to appeal this decision at WP:AN. Primefac (talk) 02:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Primefac: I really, really do promise I will behave with AWB. I don't know anything about politics. I haven't done anything wrong. Secondly, this edit has been made with WPCleaner. Please give my AWB access back. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- This is not an AWB edit. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Done. Please consider this to be your last chance, though; take your time, make sure you're confident in what you're doing, and don't feel like you must click "save" if you're unsure of something. Primefac (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- This is not an AWB edit. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Primefac: I really, really do promise I will behave with AWB. I don't know anything about politics. I haven't done anything wrong. Secondly, this edit has been made with WPCleaner. Please give my AWB access back. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- I've pulled your AWB access. There are just too many complaints about your editing with it. Yes, they're relatively minor, but it shows that you're not paying enough attention to what you're doing. You are welcome to appeal this decision at WP:AN. Primefac (talk) 02:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Mz7 (talk) 03:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Re: Recent change
Hi there Pkbwcgs. I realise that double square brackets around external links or unbalanced brackets are usually to be corrected. But I reviewed each and every instance before reverting, and in each case the usage was deliberate. Please have another look: Cephalopod size#References. I've used square brackets to add notes to some of the references. Likewise, the other changes were to direct quotes, where I have quoted the original sources exactly. mgiganteus1 (talk) 18:46, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Putting a
<nowiki />between the two closing square brackets would probably achieve the desired effect while removing the page from any list of pages with errors. I haven't tested it, but it should work. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Alert
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I am currently using AWB to clean up the pages in Category:Pages using infobox rail line with deprecated parameters. However, there are more than 1,000 pages in this category. It is okay if I cleanup all 1,310 pages or do I need a bot account? Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's not a controversial maintenance task, so you're welcome to fix them yourself. Primefac (talk) 19:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- If you don't feel like doing it yourself, I'm happy to file a BRFA for ya. Primefac (talk) 19:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, I'm just going to do that anyway. Primefac (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- I am doing it right now. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Okay. Less work for me! Primefac (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Primefac: Done - 726 edits across 1,310 pages means that fixing is done. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Primefac:
- Okay. Less work for me! Primefac (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- I am doing it right now. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Reviewing AfC submissions
| This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I would love to review AfC submissions. Am I allowed to review AfC submissions? Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:25, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: All The Tropes
Hello Pkbwcgs. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of All The Tropes, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Was recently self-redirected in a GF edit, it seems. Original target is fine. Thank you. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)