User talk:Pizzaman10383

Welcome!

Hello, Pizzaman10383, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Cintas does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the greeting. I do not recall editing cintas page, and most certainly would not do so using anything but facts and references. I do agree entirely with Wikipedia's NPOV policy, though i don't always think it's perfectly applied, i do not think that's anyone's fault as we live in an imperfect, inherently biased world. Being that as it may, i believe that at this point, it would be prudent for me to update my security information, since i do not believe i edited the Cintas page. Do i have access to my edit history? Honestly I'd also like to know exactly what manner my wiki login was used to edit their page. Thanks again for reaching out. Pizzaman10383 (talk) 00:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, i found it. It was old and i didn't realize how old your edit was. I did not edit the cintas page, but being that it was 2016, i am sure that my security info has since been updated. I am not sure why Wikipedia took so long to give me notification that i had a message, i wasn't even previously aware that users had pages or could have discussions. I again want to thank you for reaching out to me. Pizzaman10383 (talk) 01:11, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at James O'Keefe, you may be blocked from editing. and adding unsourced, etc. Doug Weller talk 13:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. He iro 03:59, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hello, it seems like you’re not interested in constructively editing, so I have blocked you indefinitely. If you want to constructively edit in the future, please appeal using {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Thank you, Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 04:31, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]