User talk:Pizza With Cheesy Crust

RE: Welcome to Eltingville

Dear Pizza With Cheesy Crust,

I sincerely apologize for that edit. I am using an automatic editor called Huggle, and I accidentally reverted what you had written for Welcome to Eltingville. I tried to revert my mistake but I could not. I really am sorry, I was not intending to edit this article or your edit in any way. It's my first day using this editing program, so I hope you will understand.

Sincerely Maxis ftw (talk) 03:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Koston

Thanks for the pat on the back. It was my first table and I found no easy instructions on how to do it, as the on-forum explanations were confusing in the max. I essentially had to disassemble examples 5rom other articles, see how they were put together, and then create one for Koston. That someone noticed makes my work worthwhile. Their ought to be a "Editing Wikipedia for Dummies" that would serve me well. (chuckle). Best Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

encouraging people to continue vandalism?

you may not want to make comments [1] that appear to encourage people to continue vandalism. -- The Red Pen of Doom 04:30, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not "encouraging" anyone to do anything. I'm merely returning entries to their original states after you attempt to Wikibully others into your own point of view. Stay off my talk page. --Pizza With Cheesy Crust (talk) 04:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Note that calling another user a "Wikipedia Nazi" is absolutely unacceptable. Also, implying that you are going to engage in an edit war with another editor, regardless of the quality of that user's edits, is also probably not a really good idea. Please read WP:CIVIL, and try to come up with a way of getting your point across that doesn't sound so unfriendly and hostile. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

November 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Ungroundable. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Cirt (talk) 10:13, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/134.219.153.207 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Greg D. Barnes (talk) 00:56, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for harassment (Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/134.219.153.207). If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Black Kite 23:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]