Jump to content

User talk:Piza pokr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Drawing board has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Flewis(talk) 04:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Piza pokr, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Drawing board

[edit]

Hello, Piza pokr. Thank you for your note at the drawing board. You have a reply. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Formula (Full-length),

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Formula (Full-length), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 04:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Speedy deletion of Formula (OLD album)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Formula (OLD album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Adam in MO Talk 09:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

9th Grade Annex listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 9th Grade Annex. Since you had some involvement with the 9th Grade Annex redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 22:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]