User talk:Pithcrystal

Bwilkins
Max HP	350
Attack	76
Defense	65
Log	A fan of Jaguars who lives on the planet Earth. He's into adminship, wants to be a pro striker/linebacker, and is a VERY lethal threat. Watch out!
Moves	Football throw (150), Multikick (50x15), Jaguar stampede (500), Element Change (0)
Tattle	That's Bwilkins. He's a jaguar fan who lives on Earth. I've heard that he's a great pro striker/linebacker, and he'll use his jaguar stampede. That freaks me out. ...from what it says here, he has the ability to Superguard just like we can! Literally!

Pithcrystal
Max HP	350
Attack	76
Defense	65
Log	A 16-year-old fan of Selena Gomez who lives on the planet Earth, and is a master swordsman. He's into Mario and Sonic's games, likes drawing, and is a VERY lethal threat. Watch out!
Moves	Sword slash (150), Multislash (50x15), Sword hurricane(500), Element Change(0)
Tattle	That's Pithcrystal. He's a Selena Gomez fan who lives on Earth. I've heard that he's a great swordsman, and he'll use his Multislash move up to fifteen times. That freaks me out. ...from what it says here, he has the ability to Superguard just like we can! Better watch out for this girl, Selena Gomez! She might be twenty-one, but she packs a punch! Literally!

Pithcrystal, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Pithcrystal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mind the Kitty

The article Mind the Kitty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Factually incorrect article. "Mind the Kitty" does not appear ever to have been made into a series, but rather was a single episode of Frederator Studios' Random! Cartoons series.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm Ring2011. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Random! Cartoons, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mind the Kitty does not exist. Ring2011 (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ed, Edd n Eddy

Hi. I wanted to talk to you about your recent edits to Ed, Edd n Eddy. Generally, when making substantial changes to an article, it's a good idea to provide an edit summary or to leave a longer explanation on the Talk Page. I see that you are a newly registered user, so don't worry about not knowing this. Wikipedia has a lot of rules and guidelines, and you'll learn them as you go. Unfortunately though, Khanassassin and I had to revert your edits as there were some problems with them.

Where were you getting your information that Danny Antonucci contacted Nickelodeon before Cartoon Network? To my knowledge, the DVD interviews that are being used to source this section of the article do not specify in which order he went to the studios. When adding any information to an article, you are expected to verify it with a reliable reference. If you don't have one and were simply making an assumption, then that would be considered Original Research and isn't allowed. This is a common mistake made by new editors, so again, don't worry. I appreciate your interest in helping out with the article and welcome you to continue editing it.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask! :) --Jpcase (talk) 21:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What if the Disney Channel and Family Channel were described as an influence to moving Ed, Edd n Eddy to Boomerang? I didn't add original research — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pithcrystal (talk • contribs) 01:01, June 14, 2013

Could you clarify how the Disney Channel and the Family Channel influenced the decision to move Ed, Edd n Eddy to Boomerang? I'm going to need a little more detail in order to understand this. Simply saying that one thing influenced another though, isn't the same as citing a reference. This page - Wikipedia:Citing Sources - explains how to add references to Wikipedia; you should give it a look, but I'd willing to answer any specific questions that you might have. The main point is that we need to know exactly where you first came across any information that you want to add.

P.S. You should always make sure to sign your comments. I took care of it for you this time, but all you have to do is add four tildes (~) to the end of your post or click on the pen image at the top of the edit box. I've also taken care of the indentation for you, which is determined by the number of colons you add to the beginning of the post. --Jpcase (talk) 16:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Kenneth Far-Fetched. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Note: Google search of this title pulls up only 10 hits, and they are all Wikipedia pages. Highly unlikely that there is no coverage with the cast listed.--Logical Fuzz (talk) 18:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? Pithcrystal (talk) 18:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Boneheads. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 18:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now I'll never be able to create hoaxes... :=( Pithcrystal (talk) 18:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for sock- or meatpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. AGK [•] 21:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's It!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pithcrystal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me—I am not a sockpuppet or meatpuppet! Pithcrystal (talk) 12:20 am, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

The evidence suggests otherwise. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:44, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pithcrystal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unlikely to be a sockpuppet or meatpuppet. Pithcrystal (talk) 23:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

And I want to be a pro soccer (football) player. Sadly, you're a sock/meat and I'm a journalist. We all have our crosses to bear (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:25, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

YOU!

YOU 'DARE' NOT WANT TO UNBLOCK ME!? You'll be sad if I kill you... YOU WILL PAY! PREPARE TO FIGHT!

Pithcrystal (talk) 21:10, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. you shall see my Power soon! Until then, it is ON!!!!!! >:(