User talk:Pitejung

Re:What's wrong with my edit?

Hi, I appreciate your posting on my talk page rather than re-inserting the info. Thanks. You'll have to let me know which article specifically I reverted your edit in, since I revert many edits with week-by-week every day. However, generally, we don't list feuds until they are complete, per WP:RECENTISM. You have to judge if the feud will be important to a wrestler's overall career. IN addition, we don't list PPV matches until they have happened. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 15:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on what article. And references are always a good idea if they comply with WP:RS. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 18:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I edited Batista page. I didn't feel it week by week since I just post important event like Batista attack Edge and let CM Punk win the title or his result from the Bash. It already happen and it didn't unending fued. I already reedited it and add ref site. I just want to make it right so please don't delete it and you should edit it as example what should I do so I can update other superstar page. Pitejung (talk) 03:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted it. His brief feud is Punk isn't notable to his overall career. Think of it this way. Will anyone remember it in ten years? They'll definitely remember his feuds with Triple H, Edge and Undertaker, but Punk? Gavyn Sykes (talk) 04:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that he'd too small feud with Punk but he wrestling with Punk for title match in PPV. It should be in history book at least his title match and at least his part of let Punk wins the title, it should be in history book too. I agree with Fetal four way to edit out cause we won't have to remember it after 10 years but VS Punk at Bash and his part to let Punk cashed the bank should and his lost to Edge too. It should all be in history book.Pitejung (talk) 04:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But Wikipedia is not a history book, it's an encyclopedia. See WP:NOT. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 04:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK I see your point. I'll try to learn it. With my understand now it look like this his match with Punk on BASH will not appear on both Pank and Batista right? cause it's not important to both of them but it'll appear on Kane page when Is He alive or death angle finish.Pitejung (talk) 05:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I think it is notable to Punk, but not to Batista. Punk never had a feud with such a big name in WWE as Batista. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 06:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rycklon Stephens

I have nominated Rycklon Stephens, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rycklon Stephens. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- iMatthew _T.C. 10:52, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rycklon Stephens

I have nominated Rycklon Stephens, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rycklon Stephens. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- iMatthew _T.C. 10:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Cyber-lebrity

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cyber-lebrity, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.csifiles.com/reviews/csi/cyberlebrity.shtml, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Cyber-lebrity and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Cyber-lebrity with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cyber-lebrity.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Cyber-lebrity/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Cyber-lebrity saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 15:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angela Marie Fong

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Angela Marie Fong, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://angela-fong.net/Angela.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:48, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Angela Marie Fong

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Angela Marie Fong, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://angela-fong.net/Angela.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:00, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Angela Marie Fong

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Angela Marie Fong, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://angela-fong.net/Angela.html and www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/profiles/a/angela-fong.html. As a copyright violation, Angela Marie Fong appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Angela Marie Fong has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Angela Marie Fong and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Angela Marie Fong with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Angela Marie Fong.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]