User talk:Pirata030

Welcome!

Hello, Pirata030, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:KeDo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 09:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:KeDo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:KeDo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 09:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pirata030 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my previous contributions were perceived as promotional and did not fully comply with Wikipedia's guidelines. I apologize for this oversight. My intention is to provide a neutral and informative article about KeDo and Xlab Cloud Services BV. :I have reviewed Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality, reliable sources, and conflict of interest, and I am committed to making the necessary changes to meet these standards. I will ensure that the content is written in a neutral tone and is well-supported by multiple independent, reliable sources. :I kindly request that my account be unblocked so that I can contribute to Wikipedia in accordance with its guidelines. Thank you for your understanding. Pirata030 (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not convincing. Nothing here explains how your edits would be significantly different if unblocked. Frankly, given how completely inappropriate your contributions to KeDo were, it's unlikely you'll be unblocked to continue writing in that subject area. Yamla (talk) 11:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pirata030 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for the previous oversight in my contributions. I understand that my edits did not meet Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and non-promotion. To address this, I am committed to making substantial changes to how I contribute: Neutral Tone: I will ensure that all content is written from a neutral point of view, avoiding any promotional language. Reliable Sources: I will rely solely on independent, reliable sources to substantiate the content, ensuring it meets Wikipedia's guidelines for verifiability and notability. Conflict of Interest: I will disclose my association with Xlab Cloud Services BV clearly and ensure that my edits are reviewed by other contributors to maintain objectivity. I am dedicated to adhering strictly to Wikipedia's guidelines. If unblocked, I will work collaboratively with the Wikipedia community to ensure that any content related to KeDo or Xlab Cloud Services BV meets the highest standards of neutrality and reliability. I kindly request another chance to demonstrate my commitment to these principles. Thank you for your consideration. 2001:1C02:2B15:5000:1D62:78E3:842A:D268 (talk) 18:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you must sign in to your account to make your request. I also urge you to reread my decline, as you seem to be ignoring it. You aren't obligated to take my decline into account, but I suggest it's a good idea. Yamla (talk) 18:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pirata030 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks for your response. I understand the concerns regarding my previous contributions. I acknowledge that my edits related to KeDo may have been inappropriate as it relates to a subject that I am personally involved in even though I did try to be objective and tried not to "sell" the post. I acknowledge that it did not meet Wikipedia's standards. Moving forward, I will not be writing on this subject or any subjects that I am personally involved in for the near future. Instead, I will focus on contributing to other areas where I have no conflict of interest.

I am committed to adhering strictly to Wikipedia's guidelines and contributing constructively. I kindly request that my account be unblocked to allow me to demonstrate my ability to make valuable contributions in different subject areas. Thank you for considering my appeal. Pirata030 (talk) 18:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It has been over a month and you haven't responded to my question. In your next unblock request you should go into more detail about which topics you want to edit. PhilKnight (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you go into more detail about which topics you want to edit? Also, you should read WP:COI if you haven't already. PhilKnight (talk) 21:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]