User talk:Pinoysabroad

Welcome!

Hello, Pinoysabroad, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Yngvadottir (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kontera, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Vrenator ^talk 10:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roger Castañeda Dy, Jr. (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still not establishing the significance we need in independent notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roger Castañeda Dy, Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2005 VALENTINE’S DAY TRIPLE BOMBINGS

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as 2005 VALENTINE’S DAY TRIPLE BOMBINGS, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – 🐱? (talk) ^{(ping me!)} 05:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding that unverifed and unencyclopedic content. I am not surprised someone thought it was a hoax--the content you added didn't look like encyclopedic writing in the first place. Drmies (talk) 05:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinoysabroad: I have to go to work, but three of us have made the article clearer and started adding references. News articles and book treatments, if there are any, is what is needed. Can you give the URLs of any good news articles we haven't yet found? Non-English ones are fine, although we may need to ask you to translate titles. But I know Google won't show me all that there is. Must dash now, but thanks for the article! Yngvadottir (talk) 06:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've re-expanded it based on the sources I was able to find. Unfortunately I couldn't find anything at all mentioning Dy in connection with the investigation. I can't see any work you did on Wikipedia that has been deleted, but I noticed you had been here for 5 years and never been welcomed and given links to our policies. So I put a welcome template with special emphasis on the requirements for articles at the top of this page, where it should have been placed back then, and I sincerely apologize. You will find a brief summary of the requirements for something or someone to have a page on Wikipedia here. Even more briefly: references. We use references to support the statements in articles, and also to establish that the topic is notable as we define the term. So if you have newspaper, magazine, TV, or book coverage of Dy, cite it. Otherwise I'm afraid no matter how meritorious his service, he does not qualify for a biography here until others have written about him (and we don't use primary sources such as his own writings or his service documents). The Valentine's Day bombings, however, are notable: they have been written about both in the news and elsewhere. However, your article on them did not cite those sources (and was not written neutrally and factually). I hope you can help us out with more sources on that, and that you will start further articles; if you now see how to demonstrate Dy's notability, please go ahead and add those sources to your draft about him; I may well simply have been unable to find the coverage. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roger Castañeda Dy, Jr.

Hello, Pinoysabroad. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Roger Castañeda Dy".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roger Castañeda Dy, Jr./doc

Hello, Pinoysabroad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "doc".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:21, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]