Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I've noticed that you're editing list of cult films. Well, it could probably use a bit of work. I clean it up every once in a while to remove the questionable and unreliable sources, but I've let it stagnate for a few years now. I thought about converting it to use a sortable table, but it seemed like too much work. I don't have a problem if you want to do that, but you really need to the fix the article. It's a mess right now, half-list and half-table. I'll work on converting it fully into a table, but it will take a bit of time. Also, I'd request that you focus on converting the article rather than adding new entries. We need this fixed as soon as possible, and adding new entries is just going to delay it. I'm also not convinced that all the citations you've added go to reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please read through WP:RS. Citations must go to reliable sources. Criterion is not a reliable source. Examples would be magazines, newspapers, and books. Websites that have an editorial board and a history of fact checking also qualify. You can't just cite random websites on the Internet. I really think you should focus on fixing the article, not adding films to it. If you keep adding unreliable sources, it's just going to make cleaning up this mess even harder. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
