User talk:Pingfanlj

Welcome!

Hello, Pingfanlj, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Uncertain Set Theory, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Taqi Haider (talk) 16:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uncertain Set Theory

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Uncertain Set Theory, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Taqi Haider (talk) 16:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uncertain Entailment

A tag has been placed on Uncertain Entailment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MuffledThud (talk) 16:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uncertain Inference

A tag has been placed on Uncertain Inference requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MuffledThud (talk) 16:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Uncertain Set Theory

The article Uncertain Set Theory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's no article here. No detail, no sources. Possibly WP:NFT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. eaolson (talk) 16:59, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Uncertainty programming

The article Uncertainty programming has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's no article here. No detail, no sources. Possibly WP:NFT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. eaolson (talk) 17:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Uncertain Calculus

The article Uncertain Calculus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Even the link contains only one instance of word calculus. All the papers cited from that external link are for Uncertainty, programming, Uncertainty theory, etc.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 17:33, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Uncertain Process

The article Uncertain Process has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Even the link contains only one instance of "Uncertain process". All the papers cited from that external link are for Uncertainty, programming, Uncertainty theory, etc.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 17:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Uncertainty theory

An article that you have been involved in editing, Uncertainty theory, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncertainty theory. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andy (talk) 23:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've also nominated several other articles that you have recently created. They can all be found on the same nomination page. andy (talk) 23:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion debate

Hello. You have been making lots of changes to Uncertainty theory but you haven't participated in the deletion debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncertainty theory. I'd like to remind you that the debate will finish quite soon and it is very likely that the decision will be to make some major alterations to Uncertainty theory and to delete all the related articles. This is your opportunity to have your say. andy (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Uncertainty theory

I have nominated Category:Uncertainty theory (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Fences&Windows 17:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uncertain programming

A tag has been placed on Uncertain programming, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 14:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

=Status and Advice

you said on the talk p.

We want Uncertainty Theory to be known by more people, so they can do more help to daily life, just as probability does. Besides, if you know history about mathematics,you'll know that probability is unaccepted to the mathematicians before 1930s, but it is hot in finnance now; and we are sure that uncertainty theory will have a widely use someday.Pingfanlj (talk) 16:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But only Uncertanity theory was kept at the afd--work all the material into that. That something ought to be important someday is not notability DGG ( talk ) 17:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Uncertain programming, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. andy (talk) 21:51, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uncertainty Theory Axiom.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uncertainty Theory Axiom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]