User talk:Pince Nez

Welcome!

Hello, Pince Nez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Lra drama 06:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NB:-

"Improper capitalization" does not mean that one will use lower case for names of subjects

A red link does not mean "no such articles". Red link means "Write such articles"

Reverting your edits in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:MedInst and associated pagessarindam7 (talk) 19:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave the Cleo Higgins page alone

There is nothing wrong with a part of her Cleopatra bio being included on her page. Its apart of her history and is helpful to the people who do not wish to go to the Cleopatra page. This isn't an issue on the Beyonce Knowles page with her Destony's Child bio. I've been working on this page since it was created and i'd appreciate if you didn't remove things.

Kind regaurds

Who are you? I think you need to read WP:OWN. Pince Nez (talk) 18:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you more like! I've been helping to update the Cleo page for a long time and i don't understand why you have come along and started to remove info. Its part of her history and i will remain to keep putting it back. I've seen sections of band bios on solo artist pages and i don't see why this is a problem for you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.49.69 (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By "Who are you?", I meant that you are not signing your messages. Also, since you do not have an account, it's not easy communicating with you. Despite previous requests, you are STILL removing trivia tags and citation request tags. Stop doing that - it's vandalism.

Duplicating information across two different pages is a bad thing - if someone edits one of the pages, the change won't be reflected on the other page. You're trying to compare this to the Beyonce Knowles article, but that's a long an indepth article and the Destiny's Child info there is in proportion with the rest of the article. This is a much shorter article, and padding it out with details of Cleopatra is pointless. Pince Nez (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

stub tagging

Hallo, I've just looked at Inari, Finland because you'd labelled it as a stub, but I don't think it is one. The definition at WP:STUB starts off "A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text...", and I think that article is well beyond stub size. It's the second time today I've felt this about an article you've labelled as a stub, the other being Prince Valdemar of Denmark. If you feel an article needs expanding you could add the {{expand}} stub, but I don't think it's helpful to label either of these as a stub: it just causes more work for those of us at WP:STUBSORT. Why did you add the {{stub}} tag to these two articles? PamD (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your comment

FYI: I have replied to your comment on my talk page. ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 13:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleopatra Image

I know that you're very good with editing and i was wondering if you knew where i could get a image for the Cleopatra page. Many Thanks 11.16, 29 July 2008

Reply to Help Desk question

Hello, Pince Nez. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk#Image credits.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 02:10, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Li hongzhi curing people.jpg

The I4 template/rationale for deletion refers to:

"Lack of licensing information. Images in category "Images with unknown source", "Images with unknown copyright status", or "Images with no copyright tag" that have been in the category for more than seven days, and which still lack the necessary information, regardless of when uploaded. Note, editors sometimes specify their source in the upload summary, so be sure to check the circumstances of the image."

You will note that there is a requirement that the image was tagged for more than 7 days and after that point in time still lack the appropriate information. So the "speedy" template there was not appropriate, while the dated no-source was more appropriate. SkierRMH (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]