User talk:Pikrabi

Welcome!

Hello, Pikrabi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Chris Scott (entrepreneur), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Chris Scott (entrepreneur)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Chris Scott (entrepreneur), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Uma Khan the Great has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Uma Khan the Great. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:47, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Uma Khan the Great has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Uma Khan the Great. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insert comments for reviewers at the top or bottom of drafts. They will have to be removed if the draft is accepted. Either put those comments on the user talk page of the reviewer, or use AFC comments, which are automatically removed if the draft is accepted. If you do not know how to use AFC comments, you may ask at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uma Khan the Great (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please double-check that the links go where they are supposed to go and that all the shortened citations have full bibliographic information somewhere. For eg, there does not appear to be any full "M.N. Gadzhieva" or "Alikhanov 2005" citation, and the link to the book by Bronevsky, Semyon (1996) is not in English and doesn't lead to a source that appears to have page numbers (though the URL does verify the content, which is good).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uma Khan the Great and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uma Khan the Great, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 18:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pikrabi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 18:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Uma Khan the Great has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Uma Khan the Great. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 01:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umma Khan V has been accepted

Umma Khan V, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pikrabi, I changed the title of the article to Umma Khan V because that is how he is referred to in other articles (see Avar Khanate). You are welcome to move it to a different title. I did create a redirect for Uma Khan the Great as a search term. S0091 (talk) 15:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]