User talk:Pikazilla
User:Pikazilla/User Talk pg1 you need to upload more
Warnings
[edit]Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]
August 2008
[edit] This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you post improperly-placed jokes on Wikipedia, as you did to Bikini Atoll, you will be blocked from editing.
This is not your first attempt at disrupting the Wikipedia. Please keep your Godzilla humor to yourself. I like to saw logs! (talk) 22:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
July 2008
[edit] This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Modification of the Sun's properties, you will be blocked from editing. You're trying to be a smart-arse. Like another editor on this page said, you've been around long enough to know that you're not positively contributing to the encyclopaedia. Booglamay (talk) 23:39, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Not positively contributing to the encyclopedia? What does that mean? (ps, you misspelled encyclopedia and smart-arse is not an article on wikipedia.)Pikazilla (talk) 23:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Nope, encyclopaedia is a valid spelling (see here). And the fact that smart-arse doesn't exist was kind of deliberate. Positive contribution is the opposite of disruptive editing. Doing something good for the encyclopædia (how's that one?) - using your logic, eggs, sugar and flour should redirect to sponge cake. Booglamay (talk) 00:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Godzilla is already in the article, with an explanation for its many fans such as yourself why it is not an allegory. Do read articles right the way through before making edits.--Wetman (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Shoop dah whoop
[edit]The article Shoop dah whoop has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:44, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
January 2009
[edit]Thank you for your recent contributions to the Joker (comics) article. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we cannot accept sources that appear to be the original work of the editor. If the material you added can be attributed to a reliable source, you may add it back if you cite it. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in the verifiability of the article. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Black egg
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Black egg, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- No sources available to verify the accuracy of the article.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~ mazca t|c 16:40, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry about the edit conflicts over at That's Impossible
[edit]I won't be editing anymore, as I only picked it up from New Page Patrol and felt that I could expand it a bit. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 02:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
allo
[edit]its me from One Piece Fanon Wiki. yes you know me
Young Piece (talk) 03:05, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:100th episodes
[edit]I have nominated Category:100th episodes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:40, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Pikazilla. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Pikazilla. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article War-weariness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Wikipedia is not a Dictionary, the term "war weary" has multiple definitions
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
The page has been renamed 'Political War Weariness' to avoid confusion with war weariness associated with medical or vehicular damage. If such a page exists, then a Disambiguation page can be made in response. Political War Weariness is a broad topic indeed, but it's still only one topic. Pikazilla (talk) 17:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
If the admins find it absolutely necessary to permanently delete the page; may I recommend that I be contacted again to suggest some alternative ways the topic can still be posted and examined; say with a merger or renaming? Pikazilla (talk) 17:22, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Pikazilla. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited First Servile War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KIA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)