User talk:Piguy101/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Piguy101. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Deleting Wade Lewis and stuff (website)

Hey, I'll stop threatening if you remove the tag and forget about deletion. Okay? Simple as that. Look, Youtube channels get articles on Wikipedia without deletion. They seem to violate rules, but they stay up. How is this different? Don't remove. Just...don't. Okay? Remove the tag and I'll stop bothering you. Simple as that... Undertire8 (talk) 21:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC) Undertire8

It seems that websites given articles and mentions by Wikipedia break those rules. I'm no different. Remove the tag and I stop bothering you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Undertire8 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Oh you say that? You're no different from every other mean jerk ever. Unfair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Undertire8 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

'Kay. How do I do that? Give me information. I want the site to get views and Wikipedia could help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Undertire8 (talk • contribs) 21:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a marketing tool, it is basically like an encyclopedia. Sorry I have to agree with the deletion.23:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Hey Piguy101

Thanks for removing the speedy deletion thing.

It's my first article and I'm really enjoying the experience of writing a wikipedia article.

Please let me know if there is anything I can do to support you.

Ian Alder Robinson (talk) 01:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for making me feel good with your compliment and suggestions regarding my recent work. :-) Daniellagreen ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi Piguy101/Archive 4. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Lord Roem ~ (talk) 03:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

RM

Hi, You Have Just Deleted My Change To The Royal Mail Page. It was constructive as I think people should know who the number 1 is at royal mail in leeds as I am employed by them and have been told by my manager on many occasions I am number 1 due to my good work. This should have been left alone as this is a Key Fact. THANKS — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshBarrow (talk • contribs) 04:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

@AshBarrow: If you can find a source for that, (website, book, newspaper) please feel free to re-add what I reverted! See Wikipedia:Citing sources for help. Piguy101 (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

clay mann edit

i keep changing the page bc im clay mann . i dont like the picture and just wanted to take it away. when ppl take my pic at shows i ask them not to post online, and i know that is not something that i can control or even expect, but with my own wiki page i thought maybe it would be fair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themann007 (talk • contribs) 00:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

@Themann007: Hmmm...I am going to move this discussion to the article's talkpage so other editors can add their opinions. Piguy101 (talk) 00:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry for my disruptive editing, I just wanted to make sure that people know that Cubes is his name?

Do you accept my apology?

--92.236.128.143 (talk) 01:09, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Bertie Sidebottom... just now.

No hard feelings. Just do not do it again, or you will be blocked. Piguy101 (talk) 01:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

okay I won't, do you have any tips as to how I can become a good wikipedian? --92.236.128.143 (talk) 01:13, 9 July 2014 (UTC) Bertie x

I'll add a welcome template on you talkpage. It has helpful links on it. Piguy101 (talk) 01:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello Piguy. I left my computer for a while and came back to see a 1.8 million byte edit and revert to my talk page. It was so large it seems it never actually displayed on the visible page. Thanks for reverting.

@92.236.128.143: Yes, we know he is sometimes called "Cubes", generally not in ALL CAPS. This edit with "CUBES" not only in all caps, but also in large font, immediately appeared to be vandalism, hence the warning I issued to you. When I checked your contributions I saw page blankings and other unconstructive edits, so I had pretty much made up my mind I was going to revert your next action even it was borderline. Which I did here at the Cube disambiguation page, though I refrained from issuing another warning.

That's what happened. Now the question is does the nickname belong in the lead at Mark Cuban, and does it belong as an entry at Cube (disambiguation)? Apparently others don't think so, as I wasn't the only one reverting those additions. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 02:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Message from LuigiFan777

Piguy101, I heard that you talked to me about the Waluigi page, I made the page so people would know facts or clues about a rumor ever since Super Mario 64 DS' release. I was thinking people would want to know some facts about the theory! — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuigiFan777 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

@LuigiFan777: You need a source to keep the information. See WP:BURDEN. Piguy101 (talk) 02:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Central Valley

My edit to the Central Valley page was correct, and so was my information, read the rules of Wikipedia, as long as my edit wasn't completely incorrect you are supposed to just leave it as is, but in this case I was right and my statement is physically and literally correct. So don't go around changing edits like you're some sort of god, mind your own damn states Wikipedia. And here is my credible source http://www.library.ca.gov/CRB/97/09/ god damn I know everything and anything about central California the Central Valley of California and the central coast of California so don't go and change what I write — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladygaga328 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

@Ladygaga328: That is a great source. Where in it does it say that Central Valley is in northern California? Piguy101 (talk) 02:56, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

that was never my statement to begin with, and the Central Valley is in Northern California just not fully, and why don't you read the website since you want to act so defensive about it? You're not smart

@Ladygaga328: Alright, I'll undo my edit because the sentence says that it dominates northern California. I am also striking my notice on your talkpage as a result. Piguy101 (talk) 03:05, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Wow this could have been completely avoided if you knew what you were talking about? HMMMM who would have ever though of that idea? Don't edit Wikipedia pages you don't fully know about and great strike me all you want byeee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladygaga328 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

@Ladygaga328:Thanks Ladygaga for kindly pointing this out. I think the confusion here is partly caused by the difference between general descriptions of areas using compass point adjectives, vague terms like "northern" and "central"; and actual named regions which include those same directional modifiers. This is not an unusual problem. See the map at Central Valley (California) and then see Central California and then see Northern California. Clearly a statement saying the valley dominates Central California is nonsense in light of this; yet the valley, loosely speaking, certainly dominates the "central" portion of the state. I have changed "northern portion of California" to "Northern California" (wlinked) to clarify this. Thank you Ladygaga and you have a lovely day :-) --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 13:46, 9 July 2014 (UTC)