Jump to content

User talk:Pigsonthewing/Archive 134

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 130Archive 132Archive 133Archive 134Archive 135Archive 136Archive 140

Wikidata weekly summary #405

00:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

This Month in Education: February 2020

This Month in Education

Volume 9 • Issue 1 • February 2020


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe
In This Issue

Request for Clarification

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Sir, This is TheGoodIndian here. I see that my account on Wikispecies has been blocked infinitely, citing vandalism, on 1 March. The vernacular names for a few birds that I had added were reverted immediately. I am both surprised and confused as to what action of mine constituted vandalism. I can assure you that all I have done on this platform has been in good faith. I request you to kindly explain to me what led to this block. Regards, TheGoodIndian (talk) 14:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your most recent edit there added a vernacular name for a bird which translates as "India is at risk". Others were apparently equally unrelated to the names of birds. You are free to place an unblock request on your talk page there. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for such a quick response. My recent edits adding vernacular names of a few Indian birds, were based on a report titled 'State of India's Birds 2020'. While the original report is in English, a one page summary in Bengali was also released (as were summaries in other Indian languages), which served as my primary source. Here is the link for the original report: https://www.stateofindiasbirds.in/ And here is the Bengali summary: https://www.stateofindiasbirds.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/SOIB-one-pager_BANGLA_WEB.pdf Anyone with a proper grasp of Bengali will be able to tell you that none of the names there can possibly translate to "India is at risk". This has been a very unfortunate misunderstanding. And I request you, sir, to help me clear this, since I don't know how to place an 'unblock request'. Regards, TheGoodIndian (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
@TheGoodIndian: I looked at your edit to wikispecies:Alauda gulgula and put the name you added ঝুঁটিভরত into Google translate. The translation from Google is "India is at risk". In light of that, perhaps you want to revise your assertion that "Anyone with a proper grasp of Bengali will be able to tell you that none of the names there can possibly translate to "India is at risk". While ঝুঁটিভরত might be better translated as something like "risky", are you absolutely sure that your source doesn't have a typo?
@Andy: I don't see a similar problem with the other edits, and perhaps we ought not to assume that the local names of birds have to translate into something sensible in English? --RexxS (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
@RexxS: I will stand by my assertion. As a native Bengali-speaker, I can tell you that the word ঝুঁটি (jhoo-ti) translates to a tuft of hair on the head, or a crest, the kind that you can see over the head of a rooster or in samurai hairstyles. The second part is ভরত (bhorot), which may have been mistaken for ভারত (bharot), the name for 'India' in many Indian languages including Bengali. Nevertheless, I checked Google Translate myself and found that it is, indeed, translating ঝুঁটি as "risk". I assume that it is mistaking ঝুঁটি for the word ঝুঁকি (jhoo-ki), which is the actual Bengali for risk. I know that no Wiki project is a platform for political comments, and I have never and will never write anything so ridiculous as "India is at risk" on such a site. As for the source, since that report has been produced by renowned institutions, including the WWF and the Wildlife Institute of India, it is extremely unlikely that it will have a typo. I rest my case and request both you and Mr Mabbett to kindly remove the block on my Wikispecies account. Regards, TheGoodIndian (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
As I noted above; You are free to place an unblock request on your talk page there.. I also draw your attention to the note left on that talk page. I am now closing this discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Evidence. Please add your evidence by March 23, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.

All content, links, and diffs from the original ARC and the latest ARC are being read into the evidence for this case.

The secondary mailing list is in use for this case: arbcom-en-b@wikimedia.org

For the Arbitration Committee, CThomas3 (talk) 05:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #406

17:15, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: February 2020





Headlines
  • Armenia report: Wiki project on Museums with My Armenia
  • Brazil report: Moreira Salles Institute GLAM initiative in Brazil
  • Finland report: The Helsinki then and now exhibition
  • France report: GLAM related blogposts
  • Indonesia report: Proposing collaboration with museums in Bali; First Wikisource training in the region
  • Netherlands report: Students write articles about Media artists, Public Domain Day 2020, Wiki Goes Caribbean, WikiFridays at Ihlia - Wikimedia Nederland in January & February 2020
  • Norway report: Wikipedia editing workshop with the Norwegian Network for Museums
  • Serbia report: Great dedication of librarians
  • Sweden report: Historic photos; Support for international Wikimedia community; Library training tour; Many GLAMs improved on Wikidata
  • UK report: Kimonos and Khalili
  • Ukraine report: Winning photos Wiki Loves Monuments shown in different cities; Libraries Lead an All-Ukrainian Challenge
  • USA report: Black History Month and Open Access Anniversaries
  • Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: Summary of pilot projects, and what's next
  • Wikidata report: Leap into Wikidata!
  • WMF GLAM report: New Team Leadership, GLAM-Focused Grants Review, OpenGLAM Declaration Research
  • Calendar: March's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National String Instrument Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Watson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello from Ali

Hello Andy, thanks for your help today. --Ali OccPsychology (talk) 14:51, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #407

21:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

St. Patrick's Day

decoration + music with thanks from QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ashcott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bath
Turbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Francis Blake

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

PMV

Hello, Pigsonthewing. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 17:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Taking a flier that you won't misuse this, please use with care regarding extra features. — xaosflux Talk 17:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
@Xaosflux: I'm honoured; and that will be very useful. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello
I didn’t get an answer to this, so I thought I would ask direct. You said in your edit summary here, "Plenty of results on Google";  would you care to elaborate? The search I did for the term showed a load of hits (over 2 million!), but most of them (that weren’t in German, or were mirrors of the page here) were for the Imperial Treasury in Vienna only; while the specific searches ('Rosenborg palace + Schatzkammer', 'St Marks Basilica + Schatzkammer', etc, turned up nothing useful (8, and 5 hits resp.). There's nothing to substantiate the claim being made. Do you have any different results? If so, can you add them to the article? Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 23:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

https://www.google.com/search?q=Schatzkammer+-vienna Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:35, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

I understand your comments when it comes to the RFC—I really do. However, I'm unsure how else this issue can be put to rest other than having an RFC on the matter. While ANI is an option when it comes to Debresser's apparent refusal to accept consensus, which is disruptive, resolving the content dispute through an RFC, hopefully once and for all, is probably still useful. Best, MrClog (talk) 23:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

It is a complete waste of everyone's time. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you

Dear Pigsonthewing, thank you for taking the time of assisting me in visualising my Wikipedia:Infobox consolidation considerations. PPEMES (talk) 14:42, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020 at Women in Red

April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162


April offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wikidata weekly summary #408

17:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
For efforts in supporting minor folks out there when trying to improve things to the best of their ability. PPEMES (talk) 18:11, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Andy, your views are clear, but you should formally !vote on this. Johnbod (talk) 04:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Deaths from Coronavirus disease 2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Pigsonthewing,
There is already a pre-existing Category:Deaths from the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic category. Liz Read! Talk! 15:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

Thanks

Thanks for the tip at COIN; I may have given the company time to scrub unsightly information this time, but in the future I will be certain to archive similar material. Best. SamHolt6 (talk) 14:29, 30 March 2020 (UTC)