User talk:Piete Brooks

This is Piete Brooks's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Matthew's Piece (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Matthew's Piece and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:St Matthew's Piece, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 02:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Piete Brooks! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 02:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Piete Brooks! I'm Snowycats. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Snowycats (talk) 17:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:St Matthew's Piece has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:St Matthew's Piece. Thanks! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Piete Brooks! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Matthew's Piece (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

I'm declining this due to my prior notes, but also because I think that this needs more sourcing that isn't local or primary. I highly recommend looking for help from the WP:TEAHOUSE or Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject devoted to improving Wikipedia's coverage of protected areas - which includes parks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Matthew's Piece and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:St Matthew's Piece, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've resolved (99% sure) the style problems you found as to the various wikipedia policies (WP:N, WP:V (no breaches), WP:NPOV/bias (hardly many, but avoid non-enc. prose still think Britannia/Enacarta), WP:BIAS, WP:ORG, WP:PERSON (not really any), however could you please encourage someone to write what the park actually has. It still breaches bias, if it cannot say what the open space consists of (how many parts) and what other things the public space has. Use concise, non-media terms. Thanks.- Adam37 Talk 16:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:St Matthew's Piece

Hello, Piete Brooks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "St Matthew's Piece".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:St Matthew's Piece

Hello, Piete Brooks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "St Matthew's Piece".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]