User talk:Pierrelias

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Pierrelias/Moheb Zaki Elias has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Moheb Zaki Elias, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 19:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Hi, thanks for email. I think perhaps you misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia. It is an encyclopaedia, not a personal Facebook or similar page. Your article was written in the style of a personal reflection, not an encyclopaedia article.

I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines. Note that Youtube, Facebook and other self-created pages are not acceptable sources.
It was written in a non-neutral tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic
You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about your father, and posting a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created was a good idea, although you may not get a speedy result.

If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your father is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage of the centre in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could create a draft here, and let me know if you want me to take a look. I've recently done a very short bio of Jane Gray, which might help you with tone and layout. You don't need to bother with the fancy Cite template, just put your sources between the <ref> </ref> tags Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Moheb Zaki Elias. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

- Happysailor ^(Talk) 12:21, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dominique Lemay (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dominique Lemay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Pierrelias, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dominique Lemay (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The POV tone also needs addressing. Several frivolous childhood anecdotes could do with being removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dominique Lemay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 12:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dominique Lemay has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dominique Lemay. Thanks! jcc (tea and biscuits) 15:55, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Message on my talk page

Hi, unfortunately I can't review your draft because I have stopped participating in AFC. DrStrauss talk 11:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dominique Lemay (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by My name is not dave was:

Time to be picky -- but we don't use the 'thumb' bit in infobox images. Take a look anywhere else on Wikipedia and you will see this is not the way to do things. Fix and I will accept.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dominique Lemay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 08:01, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dominique Lemay has been accepted

Dominique Lemay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 14:18, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]