User talk:Pierredemaere

Warnings

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Photovoltaics, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please also read WP:COI. Thanks. Philip Trueman (talk) 19:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Biosolar

A tag has been placed on Biosolar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Biosolar

A tag has been placed on Biosolar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:49, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

reply

Reply

--Pierredemaere (talk) 01:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All this is very awckward from a non-user point-of-view (compare to how one interacts on blogs for instance). I think Wikipedia should seriously look into simplifying its system and I know what I am talking about. I am a teacher. Oh! One should use the EDIT button! Oh! No! One should go to the new section! Oh! One should use the timestamp! Jeesh! Why doesn't Wikipedia makes it harder for people to contribute? Maybe you need a teacher to help you with directing people what to do because it is very unnatural. Anyway, letting off some steam here.

As stated somewhere else to another person, I feel that if Dupont has the right to have a post, then should Biosolar, unless of course, Wikipedia gets money from Dupont, in which case, well, I will quietly report this to the world. My re-edited post had many references, yet, it was deleted as if it was a piece of shit. Put yourself in the shoe of your contributor. W. hates people that vandalize articles, but W. does exactly that! Odd, isn't it? Anyway, about Biosolar, any chance you will ever approve it because I am not here to waste my time!

BTW, I do not have a signature. Oh! No! Let me guess! I have to create one! Maybe it might have helped to let people know about this in the first place. No?