User talk:PierreYvesLouis

PierreYvesLouis, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi PierreYvesLouis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stochastic cellular automaton

I have restored the article - see User:PierreYvesLouis/Stochastic cellular automaton - you can edit it in your user space to deal with the copyright and other problems. Please do not move it back into mainspace without first consulting an Admin. Also in future, please post at my talk page, as opposed to in the archives - it was only by chance I saw your post! Giant Snowman 19:33, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission PierreYvesLouis

Hello PierreYvesLouis. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled PierreYvesLouis.

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PierreYvesLouis}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stochastic cellular automaton

Re Stochastic cellular automaton, can you please explain what you mean by your edit summary "copyright problems should be solved"? As far as I can tell (1) the original article was entirely copied inappropriately from other sources, and (2) the article you moved back to Stochastic cellular automaton is identical to the version that was proposed for deletion because of these copyright problems. What exactly do you think has been done to "solve" the copyright problem here? Re the comment above by GiantSnowman about consulting an administrator before moving back into article space: which administrator have you consulted? My first reaction is to move the article back into user space (or delete it) until I see some evidence that the copyright problems are indeed solved, but I'll wait for a day or so first to give you a chance to respond. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]