User talk:Pierre-delmoral

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mean Field Particle Methods has been accepted

Mean Field Particle Methods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

demize (t · c) 00:44, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What general field are you talking about in Particle filter? Is this Quantum mechanics or Physics, or a branch thereof, or what? We need just a small tad at the beginning so a non-expert can relate to this article. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pierre Del Moral, I notice that a lot of the recent additions to the Particle filter page have been made by you. And that it is now the case that a sizeable proportion of the page's references are to work that you have been involved in or that is solely your own. The article in question received a 'too technical' flag in 2012, before you started making contributions. A number of your additions are derivations with very little or no exposition, sourced from your work, and mean the entire article is not only now 'too technical' but largely incomprehensible. It is my opinion that these pieces contribute little to the 'non-expert' hoping to understand what a particle filter is, and potentially pose a conflict of interest: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Citing_oneself. Please consider removing some of this content or at least adding more exposition. $ynoptik_m4yh3m (talk) 02:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Pierre-delmoral. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 09:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]