User talk:Pieispi314thegame

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anthony Weiner sexting scandal, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Anthony Weiner sexting scandal was changed by Pieispi314thegame (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955558 on 2011-06-13T14:34:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Right Round. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Meph^talk 21:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ATTN 2over0

Aren't you forgetting something?

"Instructions for requesting an unblock will be placed on your talk page or in the block explanation."

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pieispi314thegame (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look at my edits. Even if there are 2 vandalism edits, they're the FIRST 2. That's not "vandalism-only". Over 9000! is a well-known internet meme, Silvia Browne's predictions were correct, those are the official names for LulzSec's hacks/DDoSs, etc. kthx, Pi pwns all numbers, PiisPie314 19:41, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified block evading abuser of multiple accounts; see User:Pieispi3142011N64. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pieispi314thegame (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block was indefinite, besides the fact that the editor didn't provide anything about the block. I dislike editing from an IP, and since there was no link to the clean start page, and the account was vandalism-only, I decided to start this account. kthx, Pi pwns all numbers, PiisPie314 21:16, 3 July 2011 (UTC) BTW, if it was vandalism only, my username would be "ILiketo*aLot"

Decline reason:

See WP:EVADE - editing even as an IP while you have an account that is blocked is evasion of that block. Creation of any new accounts is therefore WP:SOCK. Go back to your original account, read WP:OFFER and see you in 6 months - you'll need to prove you did not even edit as an IP (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here's proof Pi pwns all numbers, PiisPie314 21:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decided to confirm this. 208.126.168.20 (talk) 06:43, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit suggestions

Shouldn't the notice on the talk page of Vegeta about not adding "Over 9000!" to the "Appearances in other media" section be a note in that section? 208.126.168.20 (talk) 06:57, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]