User talk:Piedras grandes

Unblock me please, I have just as much a right to edit as anyone else, besides the person who blocked me was obviously trying to cover up their violation of the WP:3RR rule here, here, and here do even need to go on? clear inpropriaty, unblock--Piedras grandes 05:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The three reverts that you linked to were perfomed on more than one article, thus it doesn't breach the WP:3RR rule. Plus the rule states more than 3 reverts. - Akamad 05:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please state why you believe you have been unfairly blocked so we can look into your complaints. Thanks - Akamad 05:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters

Hi. I noticed that you voted both to support and oppose this user's RFA. Can you clarify which of your votes you intended? Thanks! --Syrthiss 15:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. I've almost done that a few times as well. :) --Syrthiss 16:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plant sexuality

I am confused by your addition of "Speedy" and "Hoax" tags to this article. Could you please explain your rationale for doing so? Thanks. Guettarda 19:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Did you read the article? Guettarda 19:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You have made a large number of edits to articles and the talk pages of articles, which are all the addition of templates which do not exist. What are you trying to do? Perhaps I can help you. KillerChihuahua^?!? 19:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use talk pages for constructive comments, not random criticism by adding a BAD label. That is not helpful or constructive. KillerChihuahua^?!? 20:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KillerChihuahua is right; this needs to stop. Edits like this, putting your "good" template on the top of an article, are a bad idea. The developers are working on a feature called "article validation" that will allow multiple voices to weigh in on article quality in a systematic manner. Until then, coming up with your own scheme is inappropriate. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 20:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Please do not use the Good and Bad templates. Good is duplication of effort with the Good article campaign; Bad is simply useless because it is criticism without details - in other words, non-helpful criticism. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks much! KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

George W. Bush

Please don't delete links to related articles; they are all relevant. Thanks. Katefan0^(scribble)/mrp 03:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Not a stub"

Why did you add the text "not a stub' to Abas, son of Lynceus? If you don't think an article is a stub, then you should remove the stub template. Also, why did you add a 'Welcome' template to the bottom of my talk page when I've already been an editor for some time? Did you mean to? BillC 18:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. KillerChihuahua^?!? 22:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT keep adding this template spam. It is not helpful nor constructive. KillerChihuahua^?!? 23:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against vandalism. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.

KillerChihuahua^?!? 23:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~{{unblock}}~~ I haven't done anything remotely vandal-like--Piedras grandes 23:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you have. You created templates which you proceeded to add, willy-nilly, to several hundred articles. You have placed Welcome messages on article talk pages and Afd pages. Your Good template is unecessary duplication of the Good article campaign; your Bad article is useless, as it criticises without being constructive; and your Sm (small) template is duplication with stubs. You have changed stubs incorrectly, in one case from a geo-stub to bio-stub, and Canada-poli-stub changed to sports-stub. You have not responded to pleas to stop this disruptive behavior which several people have left here on your talk page. KillerChihuahua^?!? 23:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was scandalized when you identified one of my articles as bad and placed your self-devised template there. Please learn to respect the rules and then come back to editing with a more mature attitude. --Ghirla | talk 00:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can he be scottish and russian at the same time? the question was nevr answered--Piedras grandes 01:14, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the point. If you have a question about content of an article, ask the question, politely, on the talk page. Then watch the talk page. KillerChihuahua^?!? 01:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's a biographical stub about a person related to Russian and Scottish topics. {{Fooian-bio-stub}} is not restricted to "people born in Foo", it can also be people who were born elsewhere but migrated to Foo, or lived in Foo and were part of Fooian society when they made part of their notable contribution... it's easy to be considered both a Scotland-related person and an Russia-related person. Guettarda 02:02, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/EurekaLott

I'm not causing spite to anyone, it's a support vote, it's spite-free--Piedras grandes 23:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NoSeptember's RfA

Thank you, Piedras grandes, for your support of my RfA. If you ever need for anything, please contact me. I will do my best in my new role and welcome your feedback. NoSeptember ^talk 17:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you, Piedras grandes
	for voting in my RFA. It failed with a result of 31/11/2. I'm afraid my Spanish isn't too good, but does your username mean Giant Feet or have I got confused? If you have any comments, please say so here.

Adminship

Because of your really really useful templates, i'm nominating you for adminship. do you accept? --195.188.51.100 12:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That message was from User:Bling-chav, who's also nominated two others in bad faith. Like I said in my oppose vote on your RFA, I'd suggest you decline that nomination as bad-faith. If you do come back after your block. Or whenever. NSL E _(T+C) 11:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help

You asked for help and i am here. What can i do for you?--Ali K 13:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]