User talk:Pie on ear
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 18:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Pie on ear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am very confused by this, who I am supposed to be a sockpuppet of? Is this something to with trying to edit Northwich Victoria and Witton Albion as I was told I couldn't edit those
Decline reason:
You seem to have answered your own question with your signature; you've been triggering edit filters specifically created to mark Tile Join. Kuru (talk) 22:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
See my tile 18:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- My input on this is that to me, it looks like a false positive, but that the last time I saw a report on this particular filter I thought the same thing and it turned out it was Tile join all along. The other edits of this account made me suspicious enough to look further into the story. I said much the same thing over here. —Soap— 00:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
So it seems it is possible to look like him. He ruined Wikipedia for me with his abuse of my old account. Which is still happening from the IP address that I made 10 changes to. The changes I tried to make to Witton Albion and Northwich Vics were genuine as I hadn't tried to edit them since giving up with my old account because of him. The signature was daft as he doesn't use ones like that. I notice he accuse other accounts of being my old account. I feel daft for letting this happen as I would've liked to return properly. See my tile 05:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)