User talk:Pichemist/Archive 9
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Pichemist. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Question from Ilikecheese142 (03:24, 1 September 2022)
Hello! Can you edit my edits ? --Ilikecheese142 (talk) 03:24, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hey! What edits are you referring to and how do you want me to edit them for you? Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 16:03, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Question from SindhiRajparJatt (09:04, 1 September 2022)
hi why are some editors so stupid ? --SindhiRajparJatt (talk) 09:04, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- That is a very good question, it (might) be because editors are human too. (I know right!) Do be patient when dealing with people and remember that everyone is still learning. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 16:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Question from SindhiRajparJatt (15:23, 3 September 2022)
Are you a friend? --SindhiRajparJatt (talk) 15:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sure why not! Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 19:48, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Question from Pennystaccs (15:55, 6 September 2022)
Hi thanks for putting in the time it takes to be a mentor. I appreciate that. I had originally signed up with the intention of creating a Wikipedia page for my stage persona Penny Sta¢¢s. However some of the guidelines I've found imply that this maybe frowned upon, if not outright illegal. Can you give me any advice on this? I had planned on keeping things extremely neutral, and including only a couple of quick facts. Thanks for you guidance. --Pennystaccs (talk) 15:55, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hey! I'd recommend you read WP:NPOV so as to fix any confusion that you might have had. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 11:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
GAN review
Hi Pichemist, could you take another look at Talk:Maltese nationality law/GA1? There is no detail in this review which notes how the article meets the various criteria, per WP:GAN/I#R3. The pass template there is also something for a user talk page, not for the GAN page. Best, CMD (talk) 00:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- I thought it was obvious that it met the criteria, also, can you please show me the correct pass template? Thank you Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 14:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's rarely obvious, others looking at the review later may be interested to see which sources were checked and what considerations regarding the criteria were made and so on. There's no template for the GAN page to pass it, although there are some to help with organisation. CMD (talk) 15:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Question from Terrrlo (19:12, 14 October 2022)
Hello how do you use sandbox --Terrrlo (talk) 19:12, 14 October 2022 (UTC)