User talk:Pichemist/Archive 64
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Pichemist. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 60 | ← | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | Archive 64 |
Question from Bugcommander (17:52, 8 August 2024)
Hello, I'm editing a wikipedia page called "Microphone Blocker". The page is full of original research and false claims. The user that made the page has a bad reputation of advertising and making promotional contributions. That being said, the only microphone blocker I know of that has provided substantial information on how it works is Mic-Lock. The product is patented, so the technology is unique only to them. I'm concerned about how I should go about editing this article without inversely making myself look like I'm advertising too. Mic-Lock doesn't seem to have any interviews or information that has been provided outside of their website. Would it be seen as promotional to cite the website directly? Thank you! I'd really appreciate it if you could look over the page, as it is sort of a mess to put it nicely. --Bugcommander (talk) 17:52, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Question from SOA DESIGN (19:10, 17 August 2024)
Hi mentor, please guide me on how to add a fresh page of information of a figure in the society. We have new sets of elected Church of Nigeria Anglican Bishops. I have some information about to add to Wikipedia --SOA DESIGN (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)